Wikipedia:Editor review/Tinkleheimer

Tinkleheimer
Hey there, my name is Trevor and I wish to be reviewed mainly because I feel I haven't really gotten any acknowledgements or critiques on my work. I am hoping this will help me learn more about myself. :)  &lt;3  Tinkleheimer   TALK!!  05:12, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * I'll not remove the asterisk because this is a fairly short review. Just wanted to say your judgment is usually fairly sound; haven't really run into you much other than in RFA though, so can't say much. Cheers, · AndonicO  Engage. 19:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I am not in the habit of upsetting guys who stand 6'7" and sport five tattoos...but in all seriousness, I've no reason to bring upsetting news. I have admired the depth and scope of your Wikipedia contributions, particularly your new content creations (I wish we had more people who were dedicated to starting new articles), and I was impressed with the maturity you displayed following your recent RfA (don't worry, time is your ally).  The only advice I might offer is to participate some more in the AfD process, either weighing in on the articles for consideration or nominating articles for that slate (WP:BACKLOG) is a good place to hunt for articles in need of erasure.  In short, keep up the good work. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 
 * You do a wonderful amount of Namespace and policy stuff, which is, as said before, wonderful. I would love to see more article edits from you, and although you say that you do not do big contributions everyday, there is other stuff you could try. Maybe you could add external links, or fix dead ones? (See the latter half of this conversation for more info on that whole deal-y]) Or maybe you could peruse references and fix them? Sort them? Possibly add them? To be more conclusive, you don't need to have huge additions to do a lot of article editing. (Though, if you want a huge, fun, super awesome, cool project to work on, try helping with Big Stick Diplomacy! Please?) Leonard( Bloom ) 21:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I admit, I do not edit artices everyday, and that could be my dowfall. But everytime I feel like I expand, create, or otherwise improve an article, I am proud and pleased with it. Most recent articles include Springfield (The Simpsons) where I formatted all of the episode references and Project Runway Australia, a new article which I am hoping is going to be my first Did You Know.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * In the past, I did have a few problems, but it couldn't have been major because I don't remember details. I think the main one in my past was a conflict I and several other editors had with User:Green Kirby, whom is now unblocked. Recently however, I was in a minor conflict with 2 editors about whether controversial userboxes should remain on User:Laralove's user page while a discussion about them is going on or if they should be removed. I felt they should be included on there as because from what I could tell at the time, there was still no consensus on either part.
 * In the past, I did have a few problems, but it couldn't have been major because I don't remember details. I think the main one in my past was a conflict I and several other editors had with User:Green Kirby, whom is now unblocked. Recently however, I was in a minor conflict with 2 editors about whether controversial userboxes should remain on User:Laralove's user page while a discussion about them is going on or if they should be removed. I felt they should be included on there as because from what I could tell at the time, there was still no consensus on either part.

Another minor confict I was not totally part of but did write about was about a statement that a user stated at ArbCom about another administrator. The statement was along the lines that he should be demoted for supporting White Supremacy. I made a lengthy post or two about it. I felt that I handled myself well there and hopefully got my point across.  &lt;3  Tinkleheimer   TALK!!  05:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

I feel that tinkleheimer is a great contributer to wikipedia always calm and non biased in debates and im not sure if this counts but always nice and polite:) Wannabe Wiki  ( talk ) 08:23, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment