Wikipedia:Editor review/Tnxman307

Tnxman307
Well, I've been around WP for a while (about 9 months or so) and I want to get some perspective on the edits I've been making. I'd love to hear all opinions, negative, positive, or indifferent, as my goal is to improve as much as possible. Thanks!  TN ‑ X - Man  12:59, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Wow. You've sure done a lot of edits. On the other hand, the vast majority of what I've seen is nothing but sending CSD notices out, and nominating the occasional CSD yourself. Going back a few hundred edits (which may be only for the past couple days, but wow) there is little else but CSD related edits. Someone who puts so much effort into removing content from Wikipedia (even if with automated tools) should spend at least that much effort adding content, too. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 01:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I think I have two I'm of which I'm especially proud. My first has been to the recent changes/ new page patrol. I try to catch a lot of junk as it's created. Secondly, User:Mark J Richards came to me for help on an article, Marchmont House. He did all of the heavy lifting, but I gave some pointers along the way, including setting up a sandbox for him. His article was selected for a DYK.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * The biggest stress I've had here on WP probably came from this discussion: WP:Articles for deletion/The Mana World. The original author of the article felt very strongly that the article should be kept and that he was being ganged up on by other editors. I tried to review the relevant policies with him (you can see the discussion on my talk page), but he was still upset. Eventually, an admin closed the discussion and the editor quit contributing. It was tough trying to balance the need for a quality article with another editor's feelings. I'm not sure how my response would change in the future. I would probably try to talk more with the editor on a talk page first.
 * The biggest stress I've had here on WP probably came from this discussion: WP:Articles for deletion/The Mana World. The original author of the article felt very strongly that the article should be kept and that he was being ganged up on by other editors. I tried to review the relevant policies with him (you can see the discussion on my talk page), but he was still upset. Eventually, an admin closed the discussion and the editor quit contributing. It was tough trying to balance the need for a quality article with another editor's feelings. I'm not sure how my response would change in the future. I would probably try to talk more with the editor on a talk page first.