Wikipedia:Editor review/Torreslfchero

Tolly4bolly
I have been here since last two years and I want to know what other editors think about my contributions and what can be improved. Tolly4bolly (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My major contributions have been in Bollywood film articles (creating, cleaning and expanding). I have also been fighting against vandalism (mostly throgh recent changes).
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * As far as I know, I haven't been in editing disputes. If I will be in this situation in the future, I would consult with the editor on the talk page and come to the solution.
 * As far as I know, I haven't been in editing disputes. If I will be in this situation in the future, I would consult with the editor on the talk page and come to the solution.

 Reviews 
 * Sorry for the extremely late (past 1-year) review, but I had a good look through all your contributions and archives to make sure you were appropriately using the Twinkle interface and reviewer & rollbacker permissions.
 * Overall, you seem to have a firm grasp of Wikipedia policies enough that I think I would be able to trust you using these tools. I do still however caution and ask you to be more wary of edits such as this one which may lower that trust, because the fine line between vandalism and unsourced editing is not so clear cut there. It should instead have been deferred to the judgment of another editor. These edits involving the addition of external links also seem relatively harmless, and if you think they're in contravention of Wikipedia policies you should bring it up on the anons talkpage so that both the anon and any reviewers would be able to tell why you reverted the anon. However, since these reverts have been relatively recent and I note it's only been recently that you've managed to come out of wikibreak, perhaps you're not as updated on the policies like the speedy criteria exempting educational institutions. That's quite understandable. These are I hope merely outliers and not overtly wrong reverts.
 * I've seen in your archives you've managed to field most of the questions about your reversions on your talkpage, or on the respective commentators' talkpages, quite appropriately. But my personal suggestion is that for more ambiguous reversions like mentioned before, you should write out a more personal explanation to your actions to the anon rather than just slapping a template on them like the rest of us are prone to doing. It makes you a better vandal fighter because you can at least try to reason with them.
 * Finally, as regards your content creation with Bollywood films and so forth, I think that it is impressive you've managed to create 100+ articles in 2012. There seemed to be a bit less pages in 2013 but that's alright. I hope we can expect more of the same pages about Bollywood films from you next year!
 * TeleComNasSprVen (talk &bull; contribs) 20:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)