Wikipedia:Editor review/Tow

Tow
I have been on Wikipedia for around two months now and would like to know how I'm doing.  TOW talk  19:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I primarily help remove blatant vandalism and patrol new pages. I also like helping other new editors through the feedback dashboard.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I have not yet been involved in any editing dispute but if I am involved in one some day, I would make sure I understand both sides of the dispute well. I would try and use my best judgement in accordance with Wikipedia policies to guide my actions.
 * I have not yet been involved in any editing dispute but if I am involved in one some day, I would make sure I understand both sides of the dispute well. I would try and use my best judgement in accordance with Wikipedia policies to guide my actions.

 Reviews 


 * Good user. Seen his history and is a very good faith editor. Some problems arose when taking "administrative actions" whithout being a sysop. Still needs to get involved a little further with policies, but overall good. — Hahc21 [ TALK ] [ CONTRIBS  ] 19:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keen, enthusiastic, and full of the right spirit and good intentions. Too keen however to be an admin -  I'm always suspicious about newbies who almost  immediately post an 'I wannabe a syspop' template to their user pages. Needs to brush up on policies before getting involved in semi admin areas such as NPP,  and shouldn't  be afraid to  ask for advice. The problem is that  many  deleting  admins assume that  the NPPers have properly  done their homework and may  wrongly  delete a page in  good faith. About 60% of all  patrol work  is already  a near miss. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Kudpung! Thank you for your review and for helping me with the new page patrol. I have only been on Wikipedia for around two months so I very much appreciate all the constructive criticism I get.  TOW talk  16:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Your anti-vandal work via Huggle is excellent, thank you for that! You've also done some good work helping new users at the Feedback Dashboard, which is nice to see. I'd recommend some more content work - 3,000 edits with no created articles, and a maximum of only seven edits to a single article (Narayanan Vaghul) shows a lack of content creation, and if you do indeed want to shoot for adminship someday your content work is going to need to be hugely increased. You will also need to improve your understanding of the deletion process; your current hit rate on CSDs is only about 75%, and you've only !voted a couple of times at AfD. Much as it's hypocritical of me to say it (as a chronic GLOO addict, I know how strong the call is!), it might be worth putting your anti-vandal work on the back burner for a while in order to concentrate on other areas. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 10:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your review! I have decided to try to focus more on other areas of Wikipedia. I have enrolled in the Adopt-a-User program and to learn more about other areas of Wikipedia.  TOW talk   03:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)