Wikipedia:Editor review/Tree Biting Conspiracy 2

Tree Biting Conspiracy
I've been here for around 16 months, during which I've made over 12,871 edits. I'm currently an admin on the Simple English Wikipedia (where my username is "TBC"), and I've been thinking about the possibility of RfA. So, any suggestions on the best ways for me to improve?  TBC Φ  talk?  08:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * TBC...all I can say is that I was surprised that you're not an admin. Lately, you've become hyper-involved with AfDs, but if you could help out with other XfDs, it would be fantastic (WP:CFD, or the highly unpublicized WP:UCFD). Other than that, if you're planning to have a nom, or you'd like a co-nom, I'll keep an eye out for you.  bibliomaniac 1  5  23:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd also be happy to Co-nom. Your a great editor, I'll give you some admin questions rom My Admin Coaching. Dfrg.msc 00:02, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Don't ask for review. Just go here and you'll get your mop in a week. This is a classical "I thought he's already one...". :) Max S em 21:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Portal:Food, which is currently featured. Jews in Japan, No. 5, 1948, Planetary Fourier Spectrometer, Romanian wine, Super Robot Taisen: Original Generation, Thomas Highs, Christianity in Mongolia, and Stay the course, which are all DYK.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've been involved in numerous editing conflicts, but I've always managed to do my best to assume good faith and remain civil. My most recent disputes would have to be those I've had on WikiProject Video games/Navboxes. 
 * 1) What is your Wikiphilosophy, and how has that helped guide you in your contributions to Wikipedia?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Please describe your experience and exposure to Wikipedia policy, and your application of it.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Please describe your experience and exposure to Wikipedia policy, and your application of it.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Please describe your experience and exposure to Wikipedia policy, and your application of it.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

More Optional questions from Dfrg.msc and Glen S

 * 1) In your opinion, what attributes make someone a good admin?
 * A:
 * 1) Why would you want to be an admin?
 * A:
 * 1) You find out that an editor, who's well-known and liked in the community, has been using sockpuppets abusively. What would you do?
 * A:
 * 1) If you could change any one thing about Wikipedia what would it be?
 * A:
 * 1) In your view, do administrators hold a technical or political position?
 * A:
 * 1) We all know that good-faith edits, while not being vandalism per se, sometimes reduce the quality of an article, and should be reverted or amended. In your opinion, however, is it possible for an article to be improved by edits made in bad faith? What course of action would you take if such a scenario arose?
 * A:
 * 1) What part of Wikipedia do you dislike the most or feel most frustrated with in your time here thus far (this can be a user, type of user, policy, restriction etc.)? Have you tried to overcome these and would adminship make life any easier for you?
 * A: