Wikipedia:Editor review/Twilight Helryx

Twilight Helryx
Just want to know what people think about my edits and behavior. I'm hoping to be an admin some day, so I want to be sure that everything about me is as ideal as possible. Twilight  Helryx  01:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I mainly revert vandalism (and good-faith edits) on my talk page on on Recent Changes (though lately it mostly the former; I've watchlisted a lot of articles). I also do a lot of work on Bionicle-related pages anything else that has my interest. I've recently started doing gnome work on the World War II article and am actively participating in improving it enough for GA status. When I'm not doing any of these things, I spend my time teaching my adoptees.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * For harrassing users, well, only one so far. I reverted this IP's edits for Apex predator and a few minutes later, he did this to my userpage. Fortunately, another editor so kindly reverted it for me. As side note, the vandal was miles off in his insult; he didn't even get my gender right! XD But to prevent further vandalism, I left a note on my user page for possible future vandals which you can still see today. So far, I haven't been vandalized a second time. I seldom get into any disputes. But on the few occasions that I do, they are usually peacefully resolved. My worst, and most shameful, dispute was with Ridernyc over a template. I removed it because I thought it had been resolved, but Rider saw what I failed to see. When I realized my mistake, I immediately admitted it and sent a Peace Dove with an apology note attached to him. But whatever the circumstance, I learn from my mistakes (if I was wrong) and grow ever more vigilant with myself.
 * For harrassing users, well, only one so far. I reverted this IP's edits for Apex predator and a few minutes later, he did this to my userpage. Fortunately, another editor so kindly reverted it for me. As side note, the vandal was miles off in his insult; he didn't even get my gender right! XD But to prevent further vandalism, I left a note on my user page for possible future vandals which you can still see today. So far, I haven't been vandalized a second time. I seldom get into any disputes. But on the few occasions that I do, they are usually peacefully resolved. My worst, and most shameful, dispute was with Ridernyc over a template. I removed it because I thought it had been resolved, but Rider saw what I failed to see. When I realized my mistake, I immediately admitted it and sent a Peace Dove with an apology note attached to him. But whatever the circumstance, I learn from my mistakes (if I was wrong) and grow ever more vigilant with myself.

 Reviews 


 * Well I must say. I am very impressed in your editing. Even to the point that I envy some of your contributions (in a I whish I could do that kind of way). You seem to have avoided all the issues that plague me today. Not only that but you have had no issues that I can recall. No blocks ever and you are very civil. Your on your way. Good job. (PS, sorry this review is so shore but there's nothing wrong with you that I can find. perhaps if you want to be an admin you should read over other's RFA standards and try to rate yourself and then work from there)-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk 01:40, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Why thank you, Coldplay; I'm glad you think so. =) I was just wondering what people would think about some of my recent embarrassingly clumsy mistakes like this one. =P -- Twilight  Helryx  01:56, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Regarding article writing - aiming for GA status for World War II is commendable but ambitious. If you want to push for it, there are plenty of us who will help out. Getting core encyclopedic articles audited to GA or FA is what we should really be focussing on (haha, says me who specialises in esoteric articles but there you go :)) - it might be good to go for a narrower scope one first, to get used to the GA process. If you have any hankering for a more modest/esoteric one, many of us can help too :) Having a bunch of GAs of FAs under one's belt is a very good way of showing you can get on with others :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * D'oh! I just saw Talk:World War II/GA1 - looks like there are a bunch of folks involved. If you wat help with specific copyediting let me know. Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)