Wikipedia:Editor review/Tyw7

Tyw7
- Hi. I am User Tyw7. I have been previously editing as. I have made over 268 minor edits and major on Wikipedia as both Tyw7 and Troop350. Tyw7, formerly Troop350 (talk) 19:42, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Review from kotra (talk): I found this editor review via an unsigned invitation to WikiProject Software on my talk page. Curious as to who left it, I had to go into my talk page's history, where I found it had been left by an anonymous IP. Going to the IP's talk page, I was redirected to User talk:Tyw7. Not exactly the quickest route. To solve this in the future, I suggest two things: Sign all comments on talk pages, including invitations to WikiProjects, and always remember to be logged in. Checking your other edits: Image:LiveUpdate.JPG would have been much better as a PNG (Fair Use software screenshots do not need to be poor resolution, just web resolution). Also, these two edits by you (not logged in) are concerning. Archiving very old discussions is one thing, but deleting recent discussions (except in your own user space) is usually ill-advised (see TALK). Also, histories like here lead me to recommend that you use the "Show preview" button more often, it reduces clutter in histories. This suggestion is not as important as the others, but it would be nice. Finally, it is highly recommended that editors give an edit summary for every edit they make. Often the purpose of your edits isn't clear because there is no edit summary explaining it. A basic description of your edit would go a long way. In conclusion, in browsing your edits on all three accounts, Tyw7, Troop350, and 81.86.68.253, I see some good edits, some neutral edits, and a few not-so-helpful edits. Most Wikipedia editors have a somewhat similar ratio of good:bad edits, but your bad ones are easily avoided with a couple minor changes. So if you follow the suggestions I've given here, I think you could become an exemplary Wikipedian. -kotra (talk) 19:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Review from Computerjoe. An invite to a Wikiproject is slightly annoying and could be seen as 'Wikispam', so be careful. Also, be careful not to canvas in RfAs. I'd suggest keeping UT page impersonal messaging to a minimum. Computerjoe 's talk 16:32, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * Click here to see this user's contribution as Tyw7


 * Click here to see this user's contribution as Troop350


 * Click here to see this user's contribution as anonymous user


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
 * View this user edit count as the previous user Troop350, which I changed due to a comment on role accounts, using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
 * View this user edit count as anonymous user, using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 *  I have made many edits so I consider all my work good contribution to Wikipedia.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * So far I did not encounter any edit conflicts with another user. If I ever encounter one, I would consider both sides and solve the conflict calmly.  I would consider the information that user wishes to add to Wikipedia.
 * 1) Looking at this single edit :  I compliment you on setting up the "Parentage" section of WikiProject Science, but why did you populate it with only computer science-related entries (or rather, why did you merely transclude  ?)
 * 1) Looking at this single edit :  I compliment you on setting up the "Parentage" section of WikiProject Science, but why did you populate it with only computer science-related entries (or rather, why did you merely transclude  ?)