Wikipedia:Editor review/Vltava 68

Vltava 68
I would like to know what areas I could improve on in my work. Vltava  68  13:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews  One major way you can improve on is your edit summary usage. Although the edit count tool is down as of now, I can see that there are quite a few edits where you didn't put an edit summary. This review si quite short, so I'll leave the asterisk for now. Leujohn ( talk ) 05:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I feel that I have contributed to the article "Poptropica" in getting rid of incorrect grammar and various other problems.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I found trying to prove the notability of a page I created some time ago (CCOHK) rather stressful, but that got sorted out simply by my objection, which worked. I'll deal with similar problems the same way; it's just that I thought such an orchestra would not have it's notability questioned.
 * I found trying to prove the notability of a page I created some time ago (CCOHK) rather stressful, but that got sorted out simply by my objection, which worked. I'll deal with similar problems the same way; it's just that I thought such an orchestra would not have it's notability questioned.