Wikipedia:Editor review/Waterfox

Waterfox
Hi, I've been helping out around Wikipedia actively since August mostly in many areas. I'd like a review to see how I'm doing and what I could do better.  Waterfox ~talk~ 20:42, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I'm not really into working on a specific article, I mostly do gnome work around many pages and vandalism fighting. I also nominate pages for speedy deletion when I see they're eligible, do various cleanup tasks from the backlog, typo fixing, help a tiny bit with AfC and comment at many community hubs like RfA, AN/I and the village pump.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * I don't think I've been in any major disputes, but, if I was in one, I would first try to see what I can do to solve it myself, then ask for a third opinion or mediation. If it still went on, I would go ahead and report it at WP:AN/I, or a more specific noticeboard like WP:3RR.
 * I don't think I've been in any major disputes, but, if I was in one, I would first try to see what I can do to solve it myself, then ask for a third opinion or mediation. If it still went on, I would go ahead and report it at WP:AN/I, or a more specific noticeboard like WP:3RR.

 Reviews 
 * Sorry it took so long to get a review. This is going to be concise: you're clueful, your work is largely fine, you should write an article or ten, and the only big thing I notice is a relatively low activity level. Sorry if RL takes up all your time! :( / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)