Wikipedia:Editor review/WikiMan53/Archive 3

WikiMan53
Lately, some things have been going on that aren't that good. Please tell me my faults and what to change/do better. WikiMan53 (talk) (click here) make a sig! 13:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 
 * Well, your intentions here with respect to you do not seem good, you made an MfD debate about a Users Autograph book when you previously spammed other Users talk pages asking them to sign yours, you constantly place helpme onto your talk page asking for admins to speedy delete MfD's despite repeat asking not too, getting Autographs is not the main intention of an encyclopedia, we are building it, not turning into MySpace, and getting into edit wars is unnecessary and competing with other users to see who can get the most signatures. It really is time to start solid contribs and stop this Autographs stuff and all the rest.  Te ll y a ddi ct  19:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I can't really say anything else than to agree with Tellyaddict. I looked over your contributions, and you've actually had 1/3 more edits in the User/User talk namespace than you've had in all the other namespaces combined! Wikipedia isn't about gathering sigs, having more edits than another editor, or having a nice/cool/cute/short/whatever signature; it's about building an encyclopedia! If you for some reason can't do without a nice/cool/cute/short/whatever signature, and/or the signatures from other editors, I'd advise you see if there's any other wiki you can contribute to instead. As for what to do better, I'd suggest that you drop the whole signature issue, and try not to spam users in order to have them sign your list. Contribute more to articles, and have a look through the various policies. Bjelleklang  -  talk  Bug Me  21:17, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Let's see. User has 1091 edits, and 260 mainspace edits.  OK?  Last mainspace edit was 19 March, almost a month ago.  It was to "rvv" an edit that wasn't even vandalism ; that's hot.  But looking a little further into the history, mainspace only, we find a series of edits to remove valid redlinks for articles.  After your triumph over the sea of redlinks, there's  this gem, to "correct the grammar" of Dr. King.  The hits just keep on coming.    Advice to this user: Familiarize yourself with the policies and culture of Wikipedia, and then find something you're interested in and write about it; alternately, get yourself a copy of Template:tasks and get to work.  Vandalism reversion is easy enough, and it's useful work.  Please no more User_talk.  You also might benefit from being adopted by an experienced editor in the Adopt-a-User  program.  &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 01:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not to mention the edit he made to the Dr. King article before that grammar correct was this. A complete blanking of the page.  Metros232 19:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * The ones that are actually contributing to the encyclpedia.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Yes. Considering mostly MFDs and Autograph books. I got pretty mad at the fact nobody was listening to me and my reasoning and in one mfd they said I created a personal attack which I DID NOT intend to do.
 * Yes. Considering mostly MFDs and Autograph books. I got pretty mad at the fact nobody was listening to me and my reasoning and in one mfd they said I created a personal attack which I DID NOT intend to do.


 * 1) In response to the first question, you said "The ones that are actually contributing to the encyclpedia". Does this mean you aren't pleased with any of your contributions since you've yet to contribute to the encyclopedia? John Reaves (talk) 23:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)