Wikipedia:Editor review/WilliamMThompson

WilliamMThompson
I would like to be peer reviewed because I think it will be a good way for me to recognise my strengths and weaknesses, if I could understand how people thought of me, then it would better indicate whether or not I should stay or go. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 04:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * I think you are off to a good start and I think you should stay. I do suggest participating in things like AFD's, XFD's, ect. I also suggest creating articles, keep on editing in the mainspace more, and help stop vandalism. Thanks.-- RyRy5   talk  21:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You're doing a great job. You've only been here for what, nine days, and yet you are able to communicate with others like an administrator.  IMO we are privileged to have you on board.  weburiedoursecrets  inthegarden  11:27, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


 * You seem like a great user, I wouldn't encourge this but other then that bravo-- Pewwer42 Talk  08:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * User:WilliamMThompson was revealed to be a sockpuppet. This account has been indef blocked. (see Requests for checkuser/Case/Tom.mevlie) --maclean 02:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I think my contributions to the Crusade of 1101 have been pretty good, I put a lot of effort into expanding one section of it, and I think it has come out pretty well.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I haven't been in any edit conflicts, and I hope never to get into one. The closest thing to an edit conflict could be the way I deleted a part of the article on Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet which I saw as advertising, mainly because it included package information and prices, which I saw as vandalism. But I think generally speaking I have been doing a pretty neutral job, if you know what I mean. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 05:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I haven't been in any edit conflicts, and I hope never to get into one. The closest thing to an edit conflict could be the way I deleted a part of the article on Rogers Yahoo! Hi-Speed Internet which I saw as advertising, mainly because it included package information and prices, which I saw as vandalism. But I think generally speaking I have been doing a pretty neutral job, if you know what I mean. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 05:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)