Wikipedia:Editor review/Wronkiew

Wronkiew
I figured after taking pot-shots at the other editors I should wander out on to the range. Recently I've been working on improving the article 243 Ida as a collaboration with User:Reyk. You can see the entire history of the article development here. I would appreciate any feedback you can give on process improvements. Also, I recently reviewed Poland in the Early Middle Ages against the GA criteria, and the discussion got pretty messy, so comments on that would be good. Finally, I would appreciate any other comments about my editing. Wronkiew (talk) 17:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi there, Wronkiew! It seems like you're doing a great job contributing to articles.  Your edit summaries are also very descriptive, which is good.  You might want to consider working more in the WP: namespace, in areas such as WP:XfD.  Keep it up!  -  down  load  |  sign!  22:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the feedback, and for the tea! I'll look into the areas that you mentioned. Wronkiew (talk) 06:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Good job never getting blocked, nice barnstars, and bravo for the featured article on your userpage! But the argument in Articles for deletion/Astronauts of Antiquity was a bit weak.  If a page is written in marketing language we should first try to rewrite it per WP:BEFORE and see what can be done with other sources rather than just scrap it as first option.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 15:39, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your review. I agree that my argument for deletion in that case was weak. Hopefully my AfD arguments have improved since then. Wronkiew (talk) 01:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * My best articles, by far, are Gerard K. O'Neill and 243 Ida. Also, I wrote User:DustyBot, who updates WP:DUSTY and FPC urgents. It pleases me that DustyBot is happily editing away at Wikipedia while I'm asleep. Some of my recent GA reviews and many of my peer reviews I thought turned out well.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I tend to get into conflicts with editors who I think are using Wikipedia for commercial gain or personal promotion. I try to discuss the conflict with them to come to an agreement that follows Wikipedia policies, but I haven't always been successful.
 * I tend to get into conflicts with editors who I think are using Wikipedia for commercial gain or personal promotion. I try to discuss the conflict with them to come to an agreement that follows Wikipedia policies, but I haven't always been successful.

simple:Wikipedia:Editor review/Editor-reviewsubst