Wikipedia:Editor review/X!

X!

 * Archival note: Archived with permission of user (open past 30 day time limit)-- T ru  c o   03:06, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

I've been an admin since June 2008. I have roughly 14k edits, and I'm looking for ways on how I can improve. X clamation point  05:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * You've been doing great, in my opinion! I'm thankful that you fixed Huggle .9.0 immediately after it stopped working.  You seem to be working in a variety of areas on Wikipedia, which is great.  It's quite ironic that the edit counter was made by you. :D   -  down  load  |  sign!  20:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You're doing great here on Wikipedia. You contribute to many WP areas and edit articles in a variety of topics. Just avoid problems and continue what you are doing and you should be on your way to becoming a potential admin. Also, is the edit counter your counter?-- ₮RU  CӨ   03:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * He's already an admin. :)  And yes, he did make the edit counter.  It's very cool.   -  down  load  |  sign!  04:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, he should have used the admin template instead then. Yeah it really is, it was malfunctioning the other day, but it seems to be working now.-- ₮RU  CӨ   15:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 
 * Impressed It would be easy as an admin. to get a feeling of self-importance; but, I'm impressed with your efforts to stay grounded in the community! Shows real class, and strong desire to be the best you can be.  Page Protection? - check ... Blocks Vandals? - check ... unblocks per AGF? - check ... Keeps runaway bots in check? - check ... Has a featured list under wraps? - check ... You look good to go as far as I'm concerned.  The Robert Cormier article may even be getting close to GA if you want to tweak it a little.  And, as a note from us regular editors, I appreciate the chance to "throw stones" so to speak.  To bad I can't find anything to throw. ;) — Ched ~  (yes?) 04:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Numerous GA/FA and barnstar credits on your userpage makes me happy! :) I also think you closed correctly at Articles for deletion/The Simpsons DVDs and Articles for deletion/Qore (PlayStation Network).  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * You're doing a great job, X! Good to see that you've become more active in AfD as of late. Seems to me that you're well on your way to bureaucratship. As an aside, the "View this user's edit count using X!'s counter" link is quite ironic. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Not made of fail. This helpful review is presented to you by &mdash; neuro  (talk) (review) 00:04, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm particularly impressed with the work at NPP — Ched ~ (yes?) 04:49, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * The contributions I am exceptionally proud of are those that are made to the bot community. I run multiple bots, such as SoxBot III, which reverts editing tests, and User:MPUploadBot, which takes steps to ensure that the Main Page and TFA are clean. I have been a member of the BAG since November 2007, and have remained active. In addition to my bot contributions, I feel that my contributions to WP:FS has been beneficial. While not very large, I helped revive the process after 2 months of inactivity.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Not in the recent past. I have occasionally encountered users who do not appreciate of my bots. Most of those are new users, who do not understand it. None of those problems give me real stress, though. The only cause is real life concerns, and I rarely show it onwiki.
 * Not in the recent past. I have occasionally encountered users who do not appreciate of my bots. Most of those are new users, who do not understand it. None of those problems give me real stress, though. The only cause is real life concerns, and I rarely show it onwiki.