Wikipedia:Editor review/Yankeesrule3

Yankeesrule3
I want to be reviewed because I want to be able to contribute to Wikipedia very helpfully and not accidentaly do something stupid. Yankeesrule3 (talk) 00:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions to Wikipedia are in articles about baseball players (specificially New York Yankees minor league players). I also contribute to articles relating to elements and particles, plus other aspects of modern physics
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Other users have really helped me before, and I hope to get more help here. I have only once been in an editig dispute, and it was my fault; I forgot to read the talk page before changing something. It was dealt with in a good way. No one got blocked or even warned.
 * Other users have really helped me before, and I hope to get more help here. I have only once been in an editig dispute, and it was my fault; I forgot to read the talk page before changing something. It was dealt with in a good way. No one got blocked or even warned.

 Reviews 
 * You don't really have enough edits to qualify for an editor review- some would even take this off the list without warning because it is hard to do a good review unless you have 300 reviews, my personal standard is usually 500 edits with 300 to articles, but I'll do a "quicky" review anyway. Looks like you've learned from your early mistakes about starting minor league plater articles without good sourcing. Looks like you've made good edits to other baseball player edits and also to templates. I'm not much of a template guru (and many of us aren't good at it), so anyone who is good with templates is welcome here. Seems like you have become involved in Afd's which is good. Just remember not to get caught up too much in Wikipedia space- right now you are at 50% of your contributions being to articles. Try to keep it above 50% and focus on articles.


 * Also think about focusing on one article. Make it your masterpiece, take it to Good article status- maybe even Featured article status. It would be really cool having an article you wrote on the front page of Wikipedia, don't you think? Hope to see ya around and thanks for helping!VictorianMutant (talk) 23:38, 13 October 2010 (UTC)