Wikipedia:Editor review/cwolfsheep

User:cwolfsheep
I am Michael Adams, a contributor to Wikipedia since 2004. I have been encouraging its use and have been attempting to make and suggest improvements. Cwolfsheep 04:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hi, cwolfsheep. Your edits are very strong and solid, with article creation and catagories on your agenda. I like how you've been going after the overlooked jobs. However, I would suggest that you participate in more Wikipedia processes (Peer review, WP:FA and WP:GA, Xfd's and the like). Other than this, you're very solid, and I look forward to collaborating with you.  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * A pretty good user, solid contributions. --SunStar Nettalk 17:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What an insightful Wikiproject creation! You seem to be doing well on the whole.  I just have a small suggestion on something that popped out as I was looking through your contributions: I would advise not abbreviating your edit summaries.  While experienced users may know what abbreviations like "recat" mean, many people look at article histories who are not experienced users, and they can have trouble determining what happened over time and in that single edit.  It takes but a little time to write out "recategorize" or "add category."   Happy Holidays, Dar-Ape 22:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Questionable use of nomenclature. Chose to call a man convicted of capital murder a "judicial activist" who was simply locked up for publishing an angry letter to the judge. Since he posted the source to this claim I would have thought he would have had the good sense to read it before he wrote the article.  Kade 04:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I have created the WP:INT project for developing means to improve Wikipedia. Other improvements have been an extensive article on Subject matter in South Park, and cleaning up Category:Politics and Category:Comic strips.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have managed to avoid edit wars for the most part: anyone who challenges my work, I invite them to change it themselves, since the nature of this work is collaborative.
 * I have managed to avoid edit wars for the most part: anyone who challenges my work, I invite them to change it themselves, since the nature of this work is collaborative.

Cwolfsheep 04:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)