Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Canadian campaign of 1775

Canadian campaign of 1775
I believe this grouping qualifies as a Good Topic. All of the elements are described in the main article, and are contained in Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Canada. (Note that the campaignbox contains one more entry than shown here; the extra entry redirects into Capture of Fort Ticonderoga.)

Thanks for your consideration.  Magic ♪piano 23:59, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Slightly unrelated comment: I understand why Crown Point is not its own article and not on this nom. But what makes it so important to have its own link in the campaignbox? &mdash;Goodtimber (walk/talk) 01:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Good question. I believe that there was at one time a separate article for the Crown Point action that was merged into the Ticonderoga article.  I've been cleaning up other campaign boxes, maybe I'll take care of this one too...  Magic ♪piano 14:22, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Everything looks ok to me. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note can the title of the topic be changed? Right now it sounds as if Canada fought the campaign. Try something like "American 1775 campaign in Canada". Nergaal (talk) 05:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think this makes a huge amount of sense. Canada as an independent political entity did not exist yet. Canada did in effect fight this campain, under Britain - rst20xx (talk) 16:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * "Canada" in 1775 referred to what was at the time the Province of Quebec (1763-1791), which included the territory known until 1763 as Canada, New France. Most of the historical work on this campaign refers to it as "Canada".  (This is elaborated at more length in Invasion of Canada (1775).)  Magic ♪piano 00:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - so in summary, you merged Battle of Crown Point into Capture of Fort Ticonderoga (and indeed, there's now a section on Crown Point in the latter article) and Battle of Vaudreuil into Battle of the Cedars. However here the latter article mentions that "Crossing of the Ottawa River was made between Fort Anne and Quinze-Chênes, now Vaudreuil", but not the fact that there was any conflict occurring here. Would it be possible to mention this action? Apart from that, looks good - rst20xx (talk) 16:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean. As far as I could discern, the place now known as "Vaudreuil" was then primarily known as "Quinze-Chenes".  There is a section entitled "Battle at Quinze-Chenes" in Battle of the Cedars.  Are you saying there is insufficient clarity in the explanation, or are you saying that section should be titled "Battle at Vaudreuil" (which I believe to be historically incorrect)?  (Or something else entirely?)  Magic ♪piano 00:09, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah sorry I missed that, d'oh! I just searched for "Vaudreuil" and only found the sentence I copied above. OK, that's that explained! rst20xx (talk) 08:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - rst20xx (talk) 08:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 11:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)