Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Canadian election timelines

Canadian election timelines
Tom pw (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Clear similarity between articles: layout is consistent across the lists. (NWT and Nunavut lists are different due to not having poltical parties). They are all members of Category:Canadian election timelines
 * 2) There are fifteen articles
 * 3) All articles are linked via Template:Canelections
 * 4) The articles cover federal elections, plus all the provinces and territories of Canada.
 * 5) Of the fifteen articles:
 * 6) * Eleven Twelve Fourteen are Featured Lists
 * 7) * The Nunavut article is A-Class, and won't become a FL as it only has two items).
 * The structure of the articles is similar, having the same section titles and order as much as is possible


 * Support. I would like to see some more overall sources, but overall it looks pretty good. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Most of the sources are from the library of parliament, which is a source straight from the horse's mouth. --Arctic Gnome 17:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Either that, or from the Elction authority for the province/territory in question. Quantity isn't everything :-) Tom pw (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Solid topic, with solid articles. Jay32183 18:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment should the name of the Nova Scotia article be changed to be consistent with the NB and PEI ones? - Jord 18:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Good point. Tom pw (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. --Arctic Gnome 21:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - This is a group of excellent articles, all of which share the same format, and all of which are well-linked together. This is a textbook example of a featured topic of lists.  --Arctic Gnome 21:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support Well done. CheekyMonkey 13:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support - Jord 14:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Support. Would go excellent as a featured topic. Just wondering, why aren't the pre-Confederation lists included?  Michaelas10   (Talk)   17:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Pre-Confederation material doesn't really count as Canadian, in the sense of not being part of the country of Canada. Tom pw (talk) 19:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I would support the pre-Confederation lists if someone wanted to add them in a supplementary nomination; but as per Tompw, their absence from this topic is not a gap. --Arctic Gnome 20:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Per above.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * With so much support, perhaps we can prematurely promote this one? &mdash; Deckiller 21:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It's only two more days... what's the rush? Tom pw (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nomination was promoted on 17:00, 30 January 2007 - rst20xx (talk) 13:31, 12 August 2009 (UTC)