Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Cricket/archive1

Cricket
The Cricket series is so complex, so I've decided to nominate the best, most essensial four articles in this series. If other series (history of cricket, test cricket, forms of cricket) can be improved, they can follow. &mdash; Deckill e r 04:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment on super-topics - I’m not sure about how to handle overall super topics like this one that could have many topics within them. We should figure that out on the project’s talk page, and until we have a policy on how to handle them I’m voting against all most supper topics.  --Arctic Gnome 06:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose – Because of gaps in topic. Cricket must have hundreds of articles and could be divided into several reasonably sized subtopics.  I assume that this nomination is just for the central, key articles about cricket, and in that case I think you are still missing some.  I think that central articles on cricket would also include List of cricket terms, Cricket statistics, Cricket World Cup, and The result in cricket.  --Arctic Gnome 06:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. At a quick glance, Cricket has almost no inline sources. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose: None of the articles give adequate (if at all) attention to cricket played by women. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 00:41, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Fail --Arctic Gnome 17:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)