Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Diamond/archive1

Diamond
Used to use Diamond (which could be tweaked and perhaps placed at the bottom) but the main article (Diamond, which is an FA) uses the others as subpages. The articles are well-written (Diamonds as an investment needs references but the others are done well). violet/riga (t) 10:57, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Object: Diamond looks like it'll be at FAR soon enough: only six inline citations and a huge lead. More than half of the other articles have references listed but no inline cites. Some do, but the one with the most has only 13, and most have only 5 or 6.--Dark Kubrick 15:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Diamond has 3 citations needed, and, per above, the rest have small amounts of sourcing. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Fail - --Arctic Gnome 21:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)