Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Group 12 elements/archive1

Group 12 elements

 * Contributor(s): mav, Stone, Nergaal, Double sharp, R8R Gtrs, Materialscientist, WP Elements

I feel this topic meets the good topic criteria as it is very comprehensive and its articles are all of high quality. Also, this topic would be the second GT for WikiProject Elements. Double sharp (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

20% Cooler 05:44, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mercury has an unresolved NPOV tag; Copernicium has three citation needed tags (though one is in the lead so it might not be needed if it's supported later on). GRAPPLE   X  02:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC) Support.  GRAPPLE   X  10:23, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, although unsure if there's a reference for 285bCn and clueless like Derpy Hooves at the reason for the NPOV tag at Hg. FreywaParcly Taxel
 * This is the greatest comment ever on Wikipedia.--Gen. Quon (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Support once the NPOV tag on mercury has been resolved. Until then, oppose. StringTheory11 18:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The NPOV tag on mercury has been resolved. Double sharp (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support--topic meets the criteria. Rreagan007 (talk) 00:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Several deadlinks are present in most of these articles. Check with the 'ext links' tool of the book reports for greater detail. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:54, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
 * All the dead links have been fixed. Double sharp (talk) 03:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support as long as the inline cleanup tags in Copernicium are resolved. —  Andrew s talk  00:05, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Support: Once issues have been fixed Completely.--Gen. Quon (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The inline cleanup tags have been fixed by Nergaal. Double sharp (talk) 06:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Promoted. GRAPPLE   X  20:24, 28 May 2012 (UTC)