Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Group 4 elements/archive1

Group 4 elements

 * Contributor(s): Stone, Mav, me, Cryptic C62, WP Elements

Not enough chemistry topics! --Nergaal (talk) 09:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Support I agree! Covers everything. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Support Amazing work! — Novice7 (talk) 14:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Support, with an asterisk. The section on Unpentquadium is unsourced in the main article. I'd be all the happier if you could get that sourced. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed. That is a better catch than you might have guessed (since although the statement was based on common inorganic chemistry, actual theoretical research predicts something else). Nergaal (talk) 02:11, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Support. This, along with my last edit to the main article page, makes this topic flawless. I have no opposition to the nomination. F R E  Y W A  13:52, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Support igordebraga ≠ 20:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Support - amazing! -- EA Swyer Talk Contributions 14:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment, BTW Hafnium has some deadlinks. See book report for details. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Resurrected the dead links. --Stone (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Closed with consensus to promote. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 04:50, 30 March 2011 (UTC)