Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Header

{| style="clear:both; background:none;" Featured and good topics in Wikipedia
 * width="60%" style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF; vertical-align:top;" |

A featured topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles).

A good topic is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic.

This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic. If you would like to ask any questions about your topic and the featured/good topic process before submitting it, visit Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates.

Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at Featured and good topic questions. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

The featured and good topics coordinators Aza24, MaranoFan and Kyle Peake determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived.

To contact the FTC coordinators, please leave a message on the FTC talk page, or use the @FTC notification template elsewhere.

You may want to check previous archived nominations first:
 * [ Purge the cache to refresh this page ]


 * style="vertical-align:top;padding:1em; border:1px solid #A3B1BF; background-color:#E6F2FF" |


 * colspan=2 style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid #B1BFA3; background-color:#F2FFE6; vertical-align:top;" |
 * colspan=2 style="padding:1em 1em 1em 1em; border:1px solid #B1BFA3; background-color:#F2FFE6; vertical-align:top;" |

Nomination procedure
To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button. Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure.

Supporting and objecting
Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.
 * To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
 * If you approve of a nomination, write Support followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not.
 * If you oppose a nomination, write Oppose or Object followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored.
 * To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with ) rather than removing it.

For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The FGTC coordinators are usually the ones to assess this consensus and close FGTC discussions. If there is a consensus to promote, the promote instructions are located here. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.
 * }

pl:Wikipedia:Propozycje do Grup Artykułów