Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Millennium Park

Millennium Park
While and I continue to pursue WP:FACs for several at the items in hopes of qualifying it for WP:FT, we bring it here to WP:GTC. Currently, both Chase Promenade and AT&T Plaza are at WP:PR. Neither has much notable subject matter to add.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Articles have to complete PRs before than can be considered audited for quality. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The first WP:GTC I looked at was Slipknot discography and it seems to be considered eligible.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Should I withdraw this or hope for conditional support?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:56, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Either way. Personally I think you should get those PRs done, but you might get conditional support. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 *  Oppose  and as a comment, you're right, I hadn't even noticed the peer reviews for the articles to do with Slipknot weren't finished. I shall go and switch my vote to oppose for that one, too. And as a comment, I personally will oppose the inclusion of any -articles until they've been nominated for GA, and failed solely due to inherent shortness. i.e., I want a very literal demonstration that these articles cannot pass GA - rst20xx (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose - You need to either get the two check marked articles to Good Article status or merge them, because they are not "unreleased items" or articles will a big potential for future growth. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment We just split AT&T Plaza from Cloud Gate due to complaints at WP:FAC. I will post both at WP:GAC and see how they are received.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * WOW Chase Promenade just passed. I think it may be one of the shortest GAs.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess this should be considered On hold until the GACs/PRs have all finished, at which point the nom will effectively be able to start properly - rst20xx (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * AT&T Plaza passed today.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support as GT now that all articles have passed GAC. To TonyTheTiger, don't worry, there are much shorter GAs, including New York State Route 164, one of my own. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - well done! And this whole exercise Tony also means that you have two more GAs to your name :) rst20xx (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the motivation and now support.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Fantastic work, good job! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Great job getting those 2 articles to GA. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  21:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Zginder 2008-09-29T23:35Z (UTC)
 * Support – great work on these articles. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 00:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone close this - It has clearly passed, so load it up! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree. This has had five supports for ten days and six for eight days.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Close with consensus to promote - Things have been a bit slow around here lately and I appologise for that. However, promotions are meant to stay open for 10 days, and in this case, only yesterday was that limit effectively met - rst20xx (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Supplementary nominations

 * 1) Featured topic candidates/Millennium Park/addition1
 * 2) Featured topic candidates/Millennium Park/addition2