Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Overview of Lady Gaga/archive1

Overview of Lady Gaga
Lady Gaga (born March 28, 1986) is an American singer, songwriter, and actress.


 * Contributor(s): Calvin999, Chasewc91, FrB.TG, GagaNutella, IndianBio, SNUGGUMS

Except for her biography (I contributed to the article to some extent) and discography, I have been working on all of the other lists for a year now, taking them to featured with other editors, primarily with GagaNutella. It is a comprehensive topic of the outlandish singer. --FrB.TG (talk) 12:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The topic covers the major subjects, but I hope you guys consider creating a "Merchandise of LG" article too to cover things like Lady Gaga Fame, Eau de Gaga, Lady Gaga x Terry Richardson, and Lady Gaga: Queen of Pop and perhaps even Haus of Gaga and Born This Way Foundation. Really big celebrities like this should have an extra article on their "non-music" part of their fame/fortune. Nergaal (talk) 15:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That's probably asking for too much. I don't even know any person with articles dedicated to merchandise. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delegate comment Just a reminder that topics are judged for articles that exist now, not ones that could exist in the future (that's what FTC retention is for). Whether a new article should be created or not is outside the scope of this nomination.--  十  八  20:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I agree with Snuggums, there is no reason to create an article about it. Gaga already has a complete body of articles here on Wiki. Gaga Nutella talk 20:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Concur here, lets not go really really tangent here. (My personal opinion for a merchandise article is NO at this point anyways.). — I B  [ Poke ] 08:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Just to clarify, I am not agains the topic, but I would really appreciate you guys taking a step into getting the topic 100% covering all the faces of being this famous. Lots of her money is made outside of music, but I weakli support the topic in the current form. Nergaal (talk) 14:27, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * And nobody here is against the idea, we are against it currently, because there is no real need for an article like that now. Later? Definitely as her business empire expands. Thanks for your support anyways. — I B  [ Poke ] 14:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support - Based on current articles this covers them all, they all have the expected level of quality etc.  MPJ  -DK 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 21:32, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Support – Definitely meets all of the requirements; I don't see why this shouldn't be accepted. Carbrera (talk) 03:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC).
 * Much appreciated :D <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 03:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Support; great set of articles here. Defiantly meets the criteria. Well done! - Yellow Dingo (talk) 04:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you to everyone who supported our FTC. Gaga Nutella talk 23:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

with four supports and no objection from anyone, I believe there is consensus for closure. Is there anything else needed, preventing you from doing so? FrB.TG (talk) 21:00, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Closed with a consensus to promote to Featured Topic.--  十  八  20:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)