Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Period 1 elements

Period 1 elements

 *  Nominators: WikiProject Elements, Mav, Nergaal & Gary King 

''Note: this FTC was created while a FARC was going on helium, but since then has passed. Nergaal (talk) 09:08, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Support. It's short, but I suppose it's the first step in getting the other periods featured. By the way, I don't see this listed at the featured topic candidates list. Is there a reason for that? Xnux   the   Echidna  22:08, 24 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Support and let me clear up what happened Xnux. It seems that Gary King Nergaal created the FTC's subpage, and put up links to this FTC from the talk pages of the articles involved, but didn't put the FTC up at Featured topic candidates while the Helium FARC was ongoing. So whether it had truly started yet as Nergaal says above, I'm not completely sure, though I don't think what happened was really acceptable because while I think in this particular case it's fine, and I'm sure there were absolutely no bad intentions, I think doing this kind of thing could potentially manipulate the vote. Because, in a sense it's almost like running a secret FTC first, which, while we can see that it didn't have any negative impact here, in general is a bad thing to do, because by effectively manipulating the type of users who are likely to see the FTC during the semi-secret stage, you could potentially manipulate the outcome of the vote, under the principle (I forget where it is but it's in the rules somewhere) that the person or people who vote first are likely to have a large impact on all subsequent votes. As I said, that clearly hasn't happened in this case, but in general I'm not happy with the secret stage of this, and would rather users wait until they are ready to bring the nom to FTC before creating its subpage, or certainly before linking the subpage from the talk pages of the articles involved. Anyway, on to the topic itself - meets criteria, etc etc, support - rst20xx (talk) 14:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The first vote appeared w/o the page being submitted. Check the history. In short I created the page, but seeing the comments at the FTC:Noble gases with the FARC on helium I did not submit the page after creating it. Nergaal (talk) 15:02, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Re-read what I wrote. I know full well the page wasn't submitted, and was instead expressing that I find the fact that it was created and listed on the talk pages of the articles involved well before being listed here somewhat troubling - rst20xx (talk) 16:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Support now we get the first article in two topics without being the lead in either. Zginder 2008-08-05T15:04Z (UTC)
 * Support - Short, sweet, and Featured Topic ready. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support per Judgesurreal. igordebraga ≠ 01:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Nothing wrong. I would like it to be larger...but that's pretty much how large the scope could possibly reach. --haha169 (talk) 17:56, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support. Meets the criteria. Karanacs (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Support - Very elementary; meets the criteria. &mdash; Mattisse  (Talk) 21:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Close with consensus to promote - and "very elementary"?!? groan - rst20xx (talk) 14:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)