Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Powderfinger albums

Powderfinger albums
A fully formatted version is available at User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Powderfinger FT - feel free to edit that where necessary. &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 02:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment Shouldn't Powderfinger be the lead or main article? Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 23:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I wasn't sure if I should include it or not. As it's an "albums" FT rather than one for the entire band, I thought the discog was more appropriate (as per the Wilco albums FT). But I'm not sure if Powderfinger should included, or not...what do you think? &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 23:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * If Powderfinger is the main article, then I would expect all the individual band members to be present in the topic. If the topic is just the albums, however, then Powderfinger doesn't need to be included in my opinion. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 05:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed Powderfinger from the topic then. &mdash; Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:04, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * As a contributor to most of these articles, in some way or another (though I've neglected contributing to many of their promotions to GA or FA), I believe it's definitely strong enough to be considered Featured topic material, especially since Odyssey Number Five is now also looking very likely o be promoted to FA, meaning four Featured articles (including the discography as a featured list) and every other important article is at least GA. I do believe, however, that the EPs should also be considered as part of the topic. Transfusion (EP) is a GA and the other two are in decent shape (though Mr Kneebone has suffered much due to the memory hole). I don't think it's considered essntial for all articles to be GAs, and all of the LP albums are at least that. PS: I've never contributed to a Featured topic discussion, but if it's appropriate, I of course offer my support. -- linca linca  01:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Support - fulfills all the criteria. Great work on the articles. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 19:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Support It appears to follow all the rules to my satisfaction. Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 01:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, meets all of the criteria. Hopefully you have enough resources to later add EPs and/or singles in a supplementary nomination. Teemu08 (talk) 18:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Closing nomination as consensus to promote. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)