Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Star Wars: Jedi Knight titles/archive1

Star Wars: Jedi Knight titles

 * Major contributors: Bill, UnaLaguna

The 5 games are included (Movie Battles might also make the list). Nergaal (talk) 17:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose - firstly, I think this can only be called "titles", not "series", because it does not include all articles on the series - it's missing Kyle Katarn. But if that is fixed, I weak oppose anyway because I think when there is a scope narrowing to remove just one article (the last article!), that is, to me, cherrypicking. (Also I don't see any evidence you've tried to notify either of the major contributors. Appologies if I'm missing something but if you haven't I think that's incredibly rude) - rst20xx (talk) 23:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * the character, although makes a good appearance in this series, it does not appear to me that it is limited to only this series; therefore I don't really think he is a "natural" part of the topic. Furthermore, I am not 100% sure he is actually that notable to have its own page (and I am not a deletitionist to go for deleting it). I left a notice for the major contributors to the topic; maybe they have a better opinion about this. Nergaal (talk) 01:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * He appeared in some books after appearing in the series. He is the protagonist of the series and was created for it. I don't see why his also appearing in some books detracts from that - rst20xx (talk) 09:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Support as titles - without Katarn, who was created for these games, you can't really call it 'series', but titles works fine for me. I don't see it as cherry-picking if it has a rational scope, even if there's another rational scope with one more article.  I also don't see Movie Battles as necessary in the "titles" scope; I would however like to see it in a "series" scope. -- Pres  N  03:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Support good job. And Katarn and Movie Battles would fit better in a "Series" topic, indeed. igordebraga ≠ 17:13, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Some more feedback please? Nergaal (talk) 02:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support It really does look like a good topic (no pun intended). GamerPro64 (talk) 23:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Support Solid work Staxringold talkcontribs 11:08, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2009 (UTC)