Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Triple Gold Club

Triple Gold Club

 * Co-nominators: Scorpion 0422  and  Maxim

In the immortal words of Groundskeeper Willie: "I told ya I'd be bahck!" A lot sooner than I thought too. The topic now includes both the articles on the championships and the lists of winners. I suppose that if anyone wanted, it could be limited to just the championships, but I think including the winners makes it more complete. -- Scorpion 0422  00:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support - Great job! I've also fixed up the numbering; you seem to have missed that. Nice work. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 01:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - wow, that was quick! Much better now - rst20xx (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support — Chris!  c t 04:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Having both articles and lists is far superior.YobMod 09:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support – Nice work!  The Le ft orium  12:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support - Looks excellent!  iMatthew //  talk  //  18:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support -- better than the previous nom.--Best,  ₮ RU  C Ө   16:40, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppose The members of the topic should not be the awards and the winning teams, but the people that are in the Club Triple_Gold_Club. Zginder 2009-03-17T05:27Z (UTC)
 * I disagree, this is about the actual club, not its members. Under your logic, a lot of current featured topics would need to include every winner. For example: the Gaylactic Spectrum Awards, Nobel laureates, Victoria Cross, National Basketball Association awards, National Hockey League awards and Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions topics. (and that's just FTs) --  Scorpion O'422  15:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I think either way would make a topic. "Triple Gold Club Awards" and "Triple Gold club members". Renaming this as a preemtive disambiguation might be useful, but not essential as long as it is the only one, imo.YobMod 16:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This topic is about a club, when reading the lead article, it does not go into the three awards and who won them, rather it focuses on who is a member of the club. With the other topics named, the lead is a summary and the other artilces are sublists. In this one the lead is a sublist of parts (individuals of a team) of the non-lead articles.  This is upside down. Zginder 2009-03-18T16:33Z (UTC)
 * Hmm, you do have a point. What if I added a brief summary of all three awards to the Triple Gold Club page? -- Scorpion 0422  16:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Like this? -- Scorpion 0422  17:16, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The article is now better, but I still think that the topic is not appropriate. Zginder 2009-03-24T18:28Z (UTC)
 * Then what do you want to see done? How about giving me some actual suggestions? -- Scorpion 0422  18:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I opposed because This topic should be about who got in the club not how to get in. The improvements to the lead are good, ut they do not address my problem with the topic. Zginder 2009-03-24T19:38Z (UTC)
 * I don't know how I can make it any less about the members, short of removing every mention of them. This is simply a topic with a limited definition. Per your logic, the Carnivàle FT should contain every actor and the creators because the lead of Carnivàle goes into detail about them. But that topic works with just the core articles and so does this one. -- Scorpion 0422  21:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Close with consensus to promote - in spite of Zginder's concerns, I still feel this has sufficient consensus to merit promotion - rst20xx (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)