Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Gillingham F.C./archive1

Gillingham F.C.
Fails 1d and 3a (point 2) of the criteria as List of Gillingham F.C. players (1–24 appearances) isn't a FL and List of Gillingham F.C. players (25–49 appearances) isn't an FL (although it is a FLC). - Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 11:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * What's the timescale for this? As noted, the 25-49 list is currently at FLC.  The 1-24 list doesn't need much work to the list itself, but has a large number of redlinked entries.  I'm not up to date with what the rules are on proportions of redlinks in a FL..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:52, 15 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Ultimately it is up to the coordinators but If there is obvious activity I don't see why this couldn't stay open for a couple of months. - Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 11:54, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, well as noted the 25-49 list is already at FLC and I see no reason why it shouldn't pass (it's already had one support). I'll start blitzing through creating the articles on the redlinked players so that the 1-24 list is ready to go straight to FLC as soon as the other one closes (or gains significant support)........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just as an update, the 25-49 list is going well at FLC, and the 1-24 list should be able to head there next week with a bit of luck......... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ......and now the other one is at FLC too -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:52, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Update The 1-24 list has failed at FLC, so I guess the topic now can't be saved..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * With the 1-24 list failing FLC, this topic will be delisted. The topic can always come back to FTC once everything is back in order. GamerPro64  14:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)