Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Halo media/archive1

Halo media
I am placing this topic up for FTRC as it fails criterion 3.b due to articles Halo 4 and Halo 4 Original Soundtrack are not at least Good Article. It should also be noted that while Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is not part of the topic either, it is currently at GA status. GamerPro64 02:06, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth I'm happy to add Combat Evolved Anniversary to the topic as part of this process rather than going through a separate one for it. GRAPPLE   X  02:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose Halo 4 is not part of the Good topic, so why does its status matter? You could argue that by 1d, Halo 4 should be added to the topic and therefore it would fail 3b, but I think you'd need to form a consensus to add Halo 4 to the topic before jumping to the fail step. It's not as though one of the already chosen articles lost its GA status at GAR. It does not seem necessary to me that the topic include Halo 4, and the topics that are included seem sufficient for good topic status. I oppose delisting the topic as it stands, and I oppose adding Halo 4 to the topic. But as an alternative, perhaps the topic could be limited to the "Halo trilogy" or the "Halo trilogy and related media"? --Odie5533 (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The point is that Halo 4 should be part of the topic given its stated scope. The proposed "Halo trilogy" idea seems needlessly narrow, especially as the parent article for the topic, List of Halo media, includes the missing articles. GRAPPLE   X  01:03, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * What is its stated scope? --Odie5533 (talk) 16:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * "Halo media". GRAPPLE   X  16:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delist The topic no longer contains all the articles that are within its scope, and therefore currently fails criterion 1.d. In addition to Halo 4, Halo 4 Original Soundtrack, and Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary (although it's already a GA, so it's kind of a moot point), Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn (which is also included in List of Halo media) should also be in this topic, too. Since the topic's retention period recently expired, and with 3 articles left to get up to at least GA, I believe the topic should be delisted until after this happens.--  十  八  11:05, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist Halo 4 is within the scope, as is its soundtrack and FUD. Arsenikk (talk)  18:32, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist - it no longer contains all the articles within its scope, especially Halo 4. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 03:29, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist - Halo 4 is certainly within the scope, if you were to add it this fails 1d. Domcarlo (talk) 04:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delist per above. JJ98 (Talk) 21:50, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Anyone? This should have been delisted two weeks ago, anyone prepared to do that? The Rambling Man (talk) 22:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Closed with consensus to have the topic Delisted - GamerPro64  22:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)