Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Slipknot studio albums/archive1

Slipknot studio albums
I am nominating this topic for removal as it has passed its retention period for .5: The Gray Chapter, which has not achieved at least GA status three months after the album's release, so the topic is no longer complete, thus failing criteria 1(d).--  十  八  04:57, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist This is the function of the retention list is it not? Mattximus (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * This is a perfect example why the retention criteria should be extended to something like 6 months. The band is going on tour now, and presumably sales are going to change noticeably. I put the article for GAN to see what others think. Nergaal (talk) 01:51, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree that the retention period is too short- I suspect, depending on the topic, it could realistically vary from a few weeks up to a few years, depending on the topic. However, the article falls short of GA standards- to name just two problems, the development/recording information is very light, the reception section is just a list of quotes. J Milburn (talk) 23:59, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delist unless the GAN passes before this discussion closes, which could likely happen. I know the retention period is in question, but that shouldn't override current rules. You can always renominate later.-- ɱ    (talk  ·  vbm)  18:50, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * So .5: The Gray Chapter failed its GAN. Coupled with the fact this GTRC has been going on since January, this nomination is Closed with consensus to have the topic Delisted. - GamerPro64  14:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)