Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1982 Formula One World Championship/archive2

1982 Formula One World Championship

 * Nominator(s): Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

This article is about the 36th running of the Formula One World Championship during the 1982 season. I had entered this article for FA about a year ago, but received only one comment before it was closed. I am hoping for more activity this time around. I have made some changes, but unfortunately, a nomination at peer review did not yield any involvement, so there was no external input since the last FA nomination failed. I would be glad to read your comments and suggestions to hopefully bring this article to FA status soon! Zwerg Nase (talk) 18:01, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Image review


 * File:Downtown_Detroit_Street_Circuit.svg: what's the source of the data presented in this map? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Have added the best source I could find to the image, I hope it is sufficient. Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:26, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources review

 * No spotchecks carried out
 * Links to sources all working, per the checker tool
 * Formats: a few issues:
 * Ref 12: spacing
 * Ref 38: retrieval date missing
 * Ref 58: archive date in inconsistent format. This recurs in 62, 66, 74, 81, 86, 93, 96, 99, 104, 107 and 110 (check for others)
 * Ref 115 lacks an archive date
 * Ref 116: clarify publisher: "Ask Steven" is I believe the name of the feature – the publisher is ESPN


 * Quality/reliability: Generall OK, but:
 * What makes F1 Fanatic a high quality reliable source? (refs 39, 41)
 * This has been discussed multiple times on the WikiProject, always with the consensus that, since the site is run by a professional journalist (who actually added more staff a while back), it is not treated as a blog, but as a reliable news source. Will get to the other points later, for now, thank you for going over the sources! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:39, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Otherwise the sources appear to be of the required quality and reliability.

Brianboulton (talk) 20:14, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Coordinator notes
Unfortunately this has fallen into the Older section without any prose review, again. I understand that sports articles usually struggle for reviews, and I don't particularly want to archive this again but I don't have much choice. Have you reached out to folks who have written or reviewed sports-related articles? -- Laser brain  (talk)  13:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe, , , , and can chip in, considering they are frequent editors on the F1 WikiProject. Zwerg Nase (talk) 13:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think and  have more expertise in prose review than me as they had experience with 2015 article. Corvus tristis (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

-- Laser brain  (talk)  13:22, 12 December 2019 (UTC)