Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1983 Atlantic hurricane season


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 04:36, 22 January 2008.

1983 Atlantic hurricane season


I'm nominating this article for featured article because I feel its ready. It passed its Good Article Nomination in February 2007, abandoned for a while, and finished mainly by me in November/December. Its detailed in all sections and apparently the 5th FAC for a Tropical cyclone article.Mitch32contribs 02:38, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose: the prose is excellent, but there isn't the bibliography, fundamental for a featured article. --Brískelly  &#91;citazione necessaria&#93;  08:57, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What bibliography's missing, other than not citated link?Mitch32contribs 13:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, it has a reference section, which passes FA criterion 2c. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Bibliography... books... ISBN... author... for a major study-depth. When you'll find these things, call me. --Brískelly  &#91;citazione necessaria&#93;  17:00, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Brískelly, could you please tell us which one of the Featured article criteria you feel this article does not meet? It's not clear to me (or several others, it seems) to which criterion your statements refer. This may cause your opposition to be judged as inactionable, and therefore invalid according to the instructions at the top of the page.  Pagra shtak  21:51, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

I added a Further reading section, if that's what you want. None of my references are books anyway.Mitch32contribs 17:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Contribs. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 04:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Support Excellent prose. One good thing to see is this has not been hurried, its been worked on slowly. References are great, no reason to oppose. Qst 20:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Please archive the peer review. --♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ Mitch32contribs 11:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

*Could you please source the following sentence in the predictions section.
 * "However, the predictions proved to be too high, with only four named storms forming by the end of the season and three of those reaching hurricane status." Seddon69 (talk) 20:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Some examples are:
 * ✅ Mitch32contribs 11:18, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * "..60 African systems.." things like this needs a non breaking space
 * "category 3" needs to have a nb space between the word and the category value Seddon69 (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support I believe that this article is ready now for FA. Well written, is well sourced, complies with MOSNUM, Good lead and is a notable season. Seddon69 (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment It looks good for the most part, but what is this? The system that would become Hurricane Alicia originated formed on the western end of a frontal trough that stretched form New England to the Gulf of Mexico. Juliancolton (talk) 22:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support It looks good. I can't see anything wrong. Juliancolton (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

✅Mitch32contribs 15:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC) ✅Mitch32contribs 15:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Karanacs (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Please include a citation in the ACE section for the fact that is the lease active season on record since 1914.
 * Newspaper names should be italicized in the references (you can use
 * Support good article covers the subject in depth and all-- Phoenix -  wiki  21:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.