Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2007 United Kingdom floods/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 02:56, 16 April 2008.

2007 United Kingdom floods
Nominator I'm nominating this article for featured article because it details a real life event and covers all areas of this. It also has relevant media and has 178 references to support the article. SimpsonsFan08 talk  contribs 21:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I withdraw my nomination, if that's possible SimpsonsFan08  talk  contribs 09:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose. There's a lot of good information here, and I applaud the effort that's gone into this article, but it would be better reformatted and submitted as a featured list. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 22:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Object per MF. The article is basically a list of dot points cobbled together with no cohesive structure and overview of the nature of the floods. The other issue is that the article has many one sentence paragraphs and also has lacks an integrated approach in dealing with the response to the floods; this is too much like a casualites list.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 02:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. Way too many one-sentence paragraphs and one-sentence sections. More similar to a timeline article than an article. Also, I'd like to see more sources from places other than BBC. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  12:16, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.