Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign/archive2

American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign

 * Nominator(s): Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Second nomination. I previously nominated it back in April, but it attracted no reviews, and I asked for it to be closed to make way for another article. I hope things will go better this time. This article is about American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign. This campaign was part of the campaign that is officially called "Rhineland" and went from September to December 1945. In the first decades after the war, the strategy, operations and logistics of the campaign were controversial, and many of the issues covered by the article still exercise amateur armchair historians today: why was ammunition in short supply? Was the Sherman tank the better available? Why were there so many cases of trench foot and frostbite? Why did these crises occur when the US Army was the best equipped and supplied in the world? Hawkeye7  (discuss)  21:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Support from Iazyges

 * Reviewed this at A-Class, happy to Support it for FA. Iazyges   Consermonor   Opus meum  23:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Support Comments from JennyOz
Got here. Non-milhist member comments...
 * Placeholder, hopefully finish over weekend. JennyOz (talk) 10:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Lede
 * maybe mention France Belgium somewhere
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * failure to order adequate quantities in the mistaken belief that the war would end before it was required - before they were required
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Background
 * invasion of Normandy on D-Day, - add date, this section mentions dates but no years - doesn't even "mention the war"
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Normandy lodgment area in November - previous year?
 * Changed to "two months later"
 * AS American forces confronted - As
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * confronted the defences of the - defenses
 * Good catch. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Supply depots


 * develop a maintenance area in the vicinity of Rennes, Vitré, Laval, Segré and Châteaubriant - is this just one maintenance area in vicinity of all those places or one in each?
 * One large, sprawling maintenance area. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * but Eisenhower directed that a maintenance area should not be established around Paris - why?
 * He wanted to use it as a rest area for combat troops. Added a bit more about this. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * around Antwerp, but the - add in Belgium seeing diff country now
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * but the British would not agree to this - why?
 * Source doesn't say, but I'm fairly certain that (1) the area had been allocated to the British and they already had plans for its use (2) intermingling of base units would create problems of transportation and coordination. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * This prompted in a halt to shipments to - "in" intentional?
 * Stray word. Deleted. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * depots in Seine and Oise Base Sections - wlink Oise
 * Not sure. Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Major disruption of the supply system was causes by - caused by
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Representatives from the Army Service Forces studied - add (ASF)
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Base Sections - any link? There's this but it's iffy?
 * That's World War I. ADSEC has its own article, but none of the others do. I doubt if I would create articles on the individual base sections, but I might create one on the Communications Zone some day. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Winter clothing
 * and pink trousers tended - wlink Pinks and greens
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * required frequent washing, but was difficult to iron, - remove comma before "but" if this is one message, or 'and' was difficult to iron
 * Deleted "but" Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * A shrink-resistant cotton lining meant that it could be worn with or without undergarments - does that mean no shirt or nothing under shirt?
 * Yes. See picture at right. Suggestions for re-phrasing welcome. Liberation Day 1945 reenactment soldiers Jersey 9 May 2007.jpg
 * Meanwhile, in the United States the Quartermaster Corps had - dab to United States Army Quartermaster Corps?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * just as warm at both 0 and 20 °F - both? range?
 * They're testing, so they have one of those meat freezers and set the temperature. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * where cold climate winter clothing - maybe hyphenate cold-climate
 * Hyphenated. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * through the minor ports in Landing Ships, Tank, (LSTs). - is second comma right?
 * I think we can get away without it. It's a parenthetical comma. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Seventh Army, which was supported - move wlink to here Footwear
 * Moved. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 900,000 pairs of galoshes - wlink (are these same as overshoes mentioned elsewhere?)
 * Yes. Changed so "overshoes" is used consistently. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Footwear
 * cushion-soled socks - what they made of if not wool?
 * Yes, they were woolen. Tweaked the phrasing to clarify this. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * War Department - wlink United States Department of War?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * shoes nor the combat boots were waterproof or water resistant. - or even water resistant
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * However, only Seventh Army was - the
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Medical
 * The winter of 1944–1945 in Northwestern Europe was usually cold and wet - unusually?
 * Yes. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * the daily minimum was seldom below freezing - seldom above freezing?
 * Yes. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * A cold front then blanketed the front, - any way to avoid 2 different fronts?
 * Re-phrased. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Eisenhower decided that logistical situation had - the logistical
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * In contrast, the British and Canadian armies reported only 206 cases of cold injury - insert 'together' (ie not each?)
 * Yes. Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)

Ammunition
 * The principal causes of the shortage of artillery ammunition in the ETO in 1944 varied - dot points include 1945
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * American tactics relied heavily on fire support - wlink fire support?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * were offloaded. The tonnage unloaded peaked - what is difference? offloading is transferring to somewhere after being unloaded?
 * Offloaded is wrong. Changed to unloaded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * used in the Sherman tank, and - wlink
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * and yellow for smoke on gray - yellow on gray for smoke
 * Re-phrased to clarify this. Olive shells means handle with care; gray means do not handle at all. Especially not the ones with the green bands. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * for 90-days at a time to help - hyphen needed?
 * No. Removed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * In some cases, shortages could be alleviated - meant to be new para?
 * @#$%! Firefox. Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Large numbers of women ... - wlink Rosie the Riveter
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Rations


 * wlink United States military ration (or the individuals already linked are enough?)
 * linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Although commodity loaded ships came - hyphen per elsewhere
 * Hyphenated. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * blocked off so they could be used for open storage so the contents - avoid 2x "so"? blocked off to be used for open storage so the contents
 * Re-worded. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * reefer ships arrived carrying perishables - arrived from the US?
 * Yes. Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * cars could be cleaned, cooled and inspected by the Veterinary Corps. - insert 'then' before "inspected" to avoid ambiguity ie the inspector didn't do the cleaning
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * SS Great Republic - wlink USS Pictor (AF-54)?
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Liquid fuels


 * Colonel Elmer E. Barnes recommended that a figure of 207 long tons (210 t) per division slice - remove "that"?
 * Removed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * In was uncertain as to whether this volume - It was
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Port-en-Bessin - wlink Port-en-Bessin-Huppain
 * Already linked.

Solid fuels


 * Granville - wlink Granville, Manche
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Outcome
 * until the port of Antwerp was opened on 28 November no permanent - add year here
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Notes
 * Aubin 2014, pp. 131. - only one page?
 * Only one. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Balmer - author 4 typo Williams
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Consistencies


 * Northwestern Europe v northwest Europe v North West Europe
 * Standardised on Northwest. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * overstretched v over-stretched
 * Removed hyphen. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Caption: US Navy Seabees loading ammunition at Roscoff - wlink Seabees and Roscoff
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Misc
 * talking re feet and footwear there is no mention of snow coverage (as in images)? Ie wet feet not just when rain
 * Jenny, did you blip here? Gog the Mild (talk) 12:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Gog, Blip? Moi? Nah, I wasn't sure if Hawkeye missed this or simply ignored it (which I've often invited him to do if any comment not worthy of action :) JennyOz (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Unsure what is called for here. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * update link in Siegfried Line campaign navbox to avoid redirect link


 * Updated. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * add Category:Allied advance from Paris to the Rhine?
 * Added. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

That's it. Learnt a lot, so thanks. JennyOz (talk) 10:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Once again, thank you for taking the time to review. I keep telling people that logistics is not rocket science but the devil is in the details. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

No more from me, looking forward to s'porting. JennyOz (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I was wondering if you felt in a position to either support or oppose this nomination? Obviously, neither is obligatory. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:21, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi again Gog, I've been watching changes, waiting for image review mostly. I have a few tiny things that are new since my first comments for ,
 * In preparation for operations in northwest Europe - N
 * Capitalised. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Andrew T. McNamara has new article so can now have authorlink
 * Created it myself. Linked in the body but forgot here. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Hugh M. Cole new source - authorlink
 * Linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * chaired by Brigadier General Royal B. Lord concluded - already introduced, perhaps just General Lord (or is intentional)?
 * Reduced to just Lord. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - Have you been able to address these last few? Hog Farm Talk 00:10, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * All points addressed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  05:18, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks Hawkeye, JennyOz (talk) 07:13, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Source review from Indy beetle – pass
 General comments 
 * Just a point of curiosity, but I presume this isn't called "American logistics during the Siegfried Line campaign" to differentiate it from American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign?
 * Originally there was an article "American logistics during the Siegfried Line campaign" but I split it in two to avoid concerns about the article being too large. Several editors have opined that the readers would be better-served by one really large article than two fairly large ones, as readers interested in the subject will read the whole thing anyway, but ones looking for certain information will zap to the section they are interested in, and splitting may make it harder to find. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The US Army demonstrated its ability to learn from its own experiences and to adapt to changing circumstances.[121] Many of the problems encountered during the Siegfried Line campaign in October and November could have been anticipated, and time was lost as increasingly higher echelons responded and developed solutions.[120] These two claims appear to fall under WP:RSOPINION and thus should be attributed in-text accordingly, particularly in the second sentence. "Could have been anticipated" is always going to be a somewhat subjective claim.
 * Attributed second claim inline. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  11:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * They therefore acted simultaneously as base, depot and issue depots. Should "base" and "depot" be plural?
 * They are fine. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Spotchecks -Indy beetle (talk) 03:07, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ref 18 - (Moses et al. 1945, pp. 33–38.) Appears to support both claims/paragraphs. I do note, you wrote Eisenhower directed that a maintenance area should not be established around Paris while source literally ascribes that decision to his office, Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (p. 36). I imagine you know more about how these official reports like to word things so I'll defer to you on whether it is best to say "Eisenhower" or "the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force". For citation clarity, I would also recommend breaking up the citations with expansive page ranges (33-38) to smaller page ranges attached directly to the sentences in these paragraphs which they support, if workable.
 * Changed to SHAEF. Added a bit about Eisenhower. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Ref 56 - (MacDonald 1963, pp. 411–412.) Both claims supported.
 * Ref 81 - (Gropman 1996, pp. 134–135) Good.
 * Ref 82 - (Gropman 1996, p. 95.) Good for the claim Munitions production peaked in the last quarter of 1943,, but it would be preferable if this was a point made explicitly in source text, rather than by looking at a line on a chart, due to WP:SYNTH concerns.
 * Ref 115 (Smithsonian Magazine) Good.
 * I think we're good here. Most of the sources are official publications, including some declassified assessments. Others are published by reputable publishers. -Indy beetle (talk) 04:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Support by CPA
For now I'll keep it small but might do a full review in the future. That's anything from me. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 12:46, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I see litres and tonnes I think it might be a good idea to re-read the article and remove the British English spots here and there. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Fixed the litres. Raised a discussion regarding the tonnes at Template talk:Convert. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  00:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Not those tonnes, I mean the tonnes in the Solid fuels section those tonnes should be switched with long tons. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 10:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Switched. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  11:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The deadweight tonnes have been changed to deadweight metric tons through an addition to the convert template. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:50, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Per MOS:DATETIES all the dates should be MM/DD/YYYY instead of DD/MM/YYYY.
 * MOS:DATETIES: articles on the modern US military, including biographical articles related to the modern US military, should use day-before-month, in accordance with US military usage. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "German forces beyond the Seine" Add here River.
 * WP:NCRIVER says to follow the common usage, which here is to omit "river". Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "Class II and IV depots in Seine and Oise Base Sections" Add here departments.
 * Already linked. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "have the breast cargo pockets.[30])" I think it looks nicer if the citation is put after the round bracket.
 * Hi CPA, I think this is a case of "Where a footnote applies only to material within parentheses, the ref tags belong just before the closing parenthesis." per MOS:PUNCTREF JennyOz (talk) 14:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "and August 1944 55,000 long tons (56,000 t)" Per MOS:NUMNOTES avoid akward juxtapositions.
 * Avoided. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "air and sea in January, 29,743 in February" Can you rephrase this sentence? I got confused when I first read this I thought you meant January 29 and 743 in February.
 * That's why we don't use MDY dates. Re-phrased. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "The main weapon of the divisions was the 105 mm howitzer" Compound adjective here and convert the unit?
 * Conversion isn't meaningful for ammunition calibers. No hyphenation as a proper name, per their articles. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "It was a similar story with the 155 mm howitzers" Same as above?
 * "plentiful in lieu of field artillery.[76][71]" Re-order the refs here.
 * Re-ordered. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "compatible with the 75mm gun M2–M6" Compound adjective here.
 * "production of 8 inch gun, 8 inch howitzer, 155 mm gun, 155 mm howitzer and 4.5 inch gun ammunition" This looks like compound adjectives here?
 * "from the 155 mm gun and 155 mm howitzer, through to the 8 inch howitzer, 8 inch gun and 240 mm howitzer" Compound adjectives here and convert the units?
 * "the 75 mm gun, although the NYPE gave priority to shipping the 76 mm gun version" Compound adjectives here.
 * "became available for the 76 mm gun, but less than two rounds per gun per month were received before March 1945. Shermans armed with the 105 mm howitzer" Same as above.
 * "likely to be transferred to the South Pacific" Link South Pacific.
 * Just my twopenn'orth, but this seems to be getting into MOS:OVERLINK territory to me. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "1,000,000 discarded or abandoned jerricans" --> "1 milion discarded or abandoned jerricans"?
 * Changed as suggested. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "this was burned to form a roadblock.[119][118]" Re-order the refs here.
 * Re-ordered. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me, support. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by Wehwalt

 * I've made some hands-on edits where there did not seem to be doubt about what was meant. They should be reviewed though.
 * "The advance came to a halt in September.[10] This was not a result of inadequate supplies or port capacity—there were still some 600,000 long tons (610,000 t) of supplies stockpiled in the Normandy lodgment area two months later" If I read this correctly, this gives a figure for November to explain why there weren't problems in September?
 * Yes. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "the medical annex of the Overlord plan did not mention cold injury,[37] and the medical manual issued shortly after D-Day gave them only a brief mention," Should them be it?
 * Yes. Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "Backlogs remained even after the opening of the port of Antwerp in November and were not cleared until February 1945.[40] Between June and August 55,000 long tons (56,000 t) of cross-Channel cargo tonnage had been allocated to clothing and personal equipment, but only 53 percent of that had been shipped. Some 62,000 long tons (63,000 t) remained in the UK, but its priority was so low that it could not be shipped before October.[41]" I'd toss a 1944 somewhere in the second sentence.
 * Tossed. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this. Your reviews both here and on the astronaut articles are greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Will resume with "Medical".--Wehwalt (talk) 16:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * "and the Third Army had to call off the Battle of Metz owing to ammunition shortages." This isn't mentioned in the article Battle of Metz.
 * It is alluded to. "Direct assault was forbidden against the holdout forts in order to preserve artillery ammunition". That article is poor though, especially considering that Metz was one of the United States most significant battles of the war. It seems that World War II is of little interest to Americans. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the discussion of the credit system makes it clear how this worked in practice, and how this discouraged building up reserves and the other matters complained of.
 * "ETOUSA asked for a loan of 75 tanks designated for the Mediterranean Theater of Operations, United States Army, (MTOUSA), but that had been unloaded in Marseille, on the understanding that they would be replaced from the tanks being shipped in January." Should the first use of "that" be "those"?
 * "105 mm howitzer" linked, I think, only on the fourth usage. You might want to go through similar usages.
 * Corrected. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  20:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That's it. Thanks for the kind words. An impressive piece of research.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:25, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Support--Wehwalt (talk) 17:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Support from John
Great article! I made some small copyedits, here is the cumulative diff if you want to inspect. Mostly small typos and smoothing out the language. One query (so far): when the Arado Ar 234 attack on Liege took place, you have: "...and started fires that resulted in the loss of 900,000 US gallons (3,400,000 l)." This isn't present in the Smithsonian reference, and none of my sources mention it, e.g. . My understanding was that this historic jet bomber raid was aimed at the city's rail station and achieved little, in line with the Ar 234's somewhat disappointing war record. Can this be sourced? John (talk) 17:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Ruppenthal says: "The Advance Section lost about 900,000 gallons of gasoline as the result of fires started by German planes on two successive nights". I'll dig into it a bit more. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  19:06, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for digging in and for fixing the article. That makes more sense now. I support. Good work.John (talk) 22:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Support from Ian
Recusing coord duties, I came by to perform an image review but decided I wanted to learn something so read and lightly copyedited the whole article -- very well done. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Ian, is that a general support? Gog the Mild (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sure -- organisation, comprehensiveness and supporting materials look fine as well as the prose, and I'm taking as read the source review above. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Image review -- one certainly can't complain about the comprehensiveness of the imagery, and licensing appears appropriate. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 17:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Gog the Mild (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)