Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anglican doctrine/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 21:24, 28 April 2007.

Anglican doctrine
The article has been completely rewritten, and I believe is thorough, with an appropriate balance of breadth and depth, is well-referenced, neutral, and complete. So far, it is perhaps the best representative of the articles on Anglican theology, and is particularly relevant given the ongoing, newsworthy disputes over Anglican doctrine as it pertains to the place of gays and lesbians in the church. Fishhead64 21:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The lead is too short (WP:LEAD), the article seems rather under-cited, and a brief skim found an incomplete sentence. I suspect this has quite a bit of work before FA quality. Gimmetrow 21:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Object. A highly topical, important subject, but not nearly enough inline references. AFAICT it hasn't had a peer review, either, which should always be the first stop on the way to FAC. —Angr 22:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Object As per above. Lead too short. Lack of inline citations.-- Z leitzen (talk)  03:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above, fails 1c and the lead is well short of acceptable. -Phoenix 17:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.