Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Appaloosa/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 17:10, 30 May 2011.

Appaloosa

 * ''Nominator(s): Dana boomer (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC), User: Ealdgyth, User:Montanabw

A breed of spotted horses originally developed by the Nez Perce Indian tribe, named after a river in the northwestern United States, and now registered by the third-largest breed registry in the world - this is the Appaloosa. This article has been a long-term collaboration among many from the Equine WikiProject, although Ealdgyth, Montanabw and myself have been the driving forces on bringing the article to this point. A GA review back in 2008, two peer reviews with comments from multiple editors, more comments from many editors on the talk page, and a wonderful copyedit from Malleus have also made a huge difference in the article. We have put a lot of work into this article, and look forward to all of your comments (and hopefully your support). Dana boomer (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. Please check the edit summaries. - Dank (push to talk) 03:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "Domesticated horses with leopard complex spotting patterns have been depicted in the art of Ancient Persia, Ancient Greece, the "Celestial horses" of the T'ang Dynasty in China, and 11th-century France.": nonparallel. There are several fixes, take your pick; for instance, you could put the "Celestial horses" in parentheses after "China".
 * I'll take a tweak on this, noting that according to the best of our online sources, we had the wrong Chinese dynasty too, so I shall fix all. --Montanabw
 * Some second commas are needed; I'll fill them in unless it gets tiresome. (See WT:Checklist for support in the style guides.)
 * I won't change unbeknownst because there's plenty of support for it, but be aware that quite a few writers consider it (and unbeknown) "colloquial".
 * I won't change "The battle—and the war—was over." because I like it in context, but WP:EMDASH recommends commas.
 * "new horse breeding program ... tradition of selective breeding": It's not clear to me in which ways it's new and in which ways it's traditional. Depending on what you're saying, you might be able to omit "tradition of selective breeding".
 * I've tweaked this a bit. The new program is the breeding of the Nez Perce Horse, a new cross between the Appaloosa and the Akhal-Teke. The part about selective breeding being a tradition is important, IMO, because it shows a continuation of the selective breeding they did with the Appaloosa, brought into the 21st century with the NPH. However, I could be wrong... - DB
 * Yep, that's the deal, the Nez Perce want to bring back their traditional animal, as opposed to the spotted quarter horse look that's more common today. I'll play with that a bit more. I think Dana got the rest --MTBW


 * "color pattern/characteristics": WP:SLASH recommends against slashes.
 * Changed to "and" - DB


 * "distances between 350 yards and a half mile; an Appaloosa holds the record for the 4.5 furlong distance ...": some conversions needed.
 * Done - DB


 * Support on prose per standard disclaimer. These are my edits. - Dank (push to talk) 23:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I've made a few changes per your comments above. Please let us know if further work is needed, and thanks for the support! Dana boomer (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Source review - spotchecks not done
 * Can Footnotes be two columns?
 * Done - DB


 * Need page numbers for multi-page PDFs
 * I think we got them (?) I added pp to the HYPP testing (it was only two pages, all relevant),  board motions and registration fees, updated the FEI link. The only one not paginated (that I can now find) was the Appaloosa Horse Club Rule book, which is updated yearly and sometimes repaginated in the process, there it makes a lot more sense to cite to the rule rather than the page number because we need to change the url annually ... was that the problem child? --Montanabw
 * Equine Color Genetics or Equine color genetics? Appaloosa Horse Club or Appaloosa horse Club Inc? Check for small inconsistencies
 * These two done. Didn't see any others, but will keep my eye out - DB


 * FN 15: why cite by year here?
 * Fixed - DB


 * FN 16: check authors
 * Think I fixed this? - DB


 * FN 20: the lab is part of the publisher, not the work
 * Done - DB


 * FN 23, 67, 69: repetition
 * Done - DB


 * FN 25, 37, 64: volume/issue?
 * AFAIK, no volume/issue # for any of these, just dates and page numbers. A lot of horse magazines don't use volume/issue numbers. - DB


 * FN 36: et al for only 3 authors?
 * Fixed - DB


 * Use a consistent formatting for retrieval dates
 * Think I got them all - DB


 * FN 94: the association is a publisher, not a work
 * Done - DB


 * Use a consistent formatting for editions
 * Done - DB


 * Be consistent in providing or not providing publisher locations, and if you do be consistent in whether states are abbreviated or spelled out
 * Fixed, although a couple are listed as "No location given" Ealdgyth - Talk 18:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Found a location for one per ISBN to WorldCat, noted on talk page, not sure if I should fix, or...?


 * External links could stand to be culled - don't repeat cited sources. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Culled some. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have begun work on the above issues; more later. Dana boomer (talk) 16:46, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Units Lightmouse (talk) 10:40, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It says "350 yards", "half mile", "4.5 furlong". These need conversions.
 * Done. Dana boomer (talk) 11:28, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Looking good for me now. Lightmouse (talk) 17:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Comments –
 * Breed characteristics: Two breed horse links is probably one too many here.
 * Where? I'm missing what was double-linked?  (Can fix if we know what you spotted) --MTBW
 * Sorry; that was meant to be draft horse. Fixed it myself here.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Color and spotting patterns: "The coat color of an Appaloosa is a combination of a base color with a overlaid sporting pattern." *I believe that the third "a" should be "an".
 * Fixed. --MTBW


 * History: "Domesticated horses with leopard complex spotting patterns have been depicted art dating as far back as Ancient Greece, Ancient Persia, the Han Dynasty in China". Could use "in" before "art" and "and" before "the Han Dynasty".
 * Fixed. --MTBW


 * Nez Perce War: In a very minor style point, numbers like 2000 should usually have a comma in them when used this way.
 * Drug rules: "considered drug maskers and as diuretics that can be used to make it difficult to detect the presence of other drugs in the horse's system." Something's weird about this sentence, and I think it has to do with "as". Either it shouldn't be there, or some form of connection is missing ("act", maybe?).
 * Will tweak, see what you think --MTBW


 * Note 3: Another very minor thing, but does Acepromazine need the capitalization?
 * Dana fixed that -- MTBW (for Dana)


 * Reference 78 is missing the PDF indication that the other similar cites have. Again minor, but worthwhile anyway.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 02:57, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like Dana fixed that too. --MTBW
 * I actually didn't see it, so I did this.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Re your point about "2000", the modern convention is that 4-digit numbers are not separated by commas. Malleus Fatuorum 03:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll let you two fight that one out, whatever the wikigods decree, we shall humbly obey ;-) --MTBW
 * Support. Says here that commas are optional for four-digit numbers. Never noticed that before. Oh, and I support since everything up there is done, and this is a fine article overall.  Giants2008  ( 27 and counting ) 01:23, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Comments  Just a few quibbles from a non-horseman  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:11, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Equine Recurrent Uveitis and congenital stationary night blindness &mdash; Why is the first capped, and the second lower case. Is this inconsistency, or is there a reason?
 * I'm taking a stab here, but "congenital stationary night blindness" is probably a generic term for a number of complexes, and ERU is probably one defined disorder/disease. My understanding is you capitalize single diseases, but I could be wrong here. Better to check with MTBW though, as they are the expert on the blindness thing in horses, not me. I do bloodlines and history, the others do the usage/diseases stuff. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I like Ealdgyth's explanation, but the main reason it's probably really that way is that it's capitalized in the Wikipedia article on that topic! :-)  We can do whatever the wiki MOS wants us to do, just someone let us know which is preferred.   Montanabw (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Skin mottling is "a basic and decisive indicator of an Appaloosa" and is usually seen around the muzzle, eyes, anus, and genitalia. &mdash; I'm unclear, the photos seem to show much more wide-spread spotting than just those areas
 * Skin mottling is different than spotting, and can be seen in Appaloosas with solid coat color (no difference in hair color). This is discussed further in the "Color rule controversy" section, but basically, a horse with leopard complex genetics won't always have a spotted coat, but will almost always have skin mottling in the locations listed. This last fact is what makes it one of the secondary characteristics that is looked for when registering a non-spotted Appaloosa. - DB
 * Yes, like Dana said, and the registry states it that way in their standards. Also, the mottling isn't quite the same as the "halo" effect seen under the hair coat spots, in fact the body skin isn't mottled the way the "bare" skin is around the genitals, eyes and muzzle.  Weird, but there it is.   Montanabw (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * King Louis XIV of France &mdash; Is "king" necessary, there can't be many other Louis XIV of Frances?
 * Done. - DB
 * (Autumn, 2010). &mdash; Looks odd and inconsistent having only one ref with a month/season. If it's needed to avoid ambiguity, can it be moved to the title?
 * This is a quarterly publication where the date of publication is given by the season (spring, summer, autumn, fall). So, IMO, it actually is consistent with the other references; it's just that we have used no other quarterly publications, so this one instance stands out a bit. I'm not sure why we would move the "autumn" to the title? - DB
 * Verified what Dana said. I have the hardcopy; this is a quarterly publication.  I believe that the  "date" parameter is correct, though "issue" might work? (I don't really get template syntax very well).  But definitely not part of the title.  Montanabw (talk) 00:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Follow up:  per online cite, http://mhs.mt.gov/pub/magazine/autumn2010.asp  added Volume and issue number to template (someone fix it if I got it formatted wrong??).   Montanabw (talk) 00:38, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Can US states be written in full in the cited texts for the benefit of us poor limeys?
 * Done - DB
 * I've replied to most of the above comments, but am leaving the first one because I'm really not sure. Hopefully my co-noms have a better idea on this than I do. Thanks for the comments, Jim! Dana boomer (talk) 15:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed, the ERU capitalization is probably one of these things that's all over the place on wiki. Whatever the wiki MOS says for diseases with specific names in general, we shall do. (But if we go lower case, we will need to rename the other article too, probably)  Even the horse articles are all over the place on this, so not a huge deal for us.  Montanabw (talk) 00:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, the caps issue needs resolution, but it looks as if it's beyond the scope of this FAC, so changed to support above  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  06:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Comment  I'll do some spot-checking and probably a spot of copyediting, and jot points down below...Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * "SPOT?" Ohhhh baaaad pun for this article! LOL! Montanabw (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 *  In mid-18th century Europe, there was a great demand for horses with the Appaloosa coat pattern among the nobility and royalty. - strictly speaking I suspect this is anomalous as this predates the development of the breed and the name. Can we just say "spotted" here?


 * Went with "...there was a great demand for horses with the leopard complex spotting pattern among the nobility and royalty." as we'd just used "spotted coat" in the previous sentence. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed


 * and thus were notable as horse breeders by the early 19th century - erm, well anyone who keeps horses breeds them? I guess I'd tweak to "and thus were highly regarded as horse breeders by the early 19th century" or "and thus were notable as able/canny/good horse breeders by the early 19th century" or something....


 * No, actually, not everyone who keeps horses breeds them. Lots of Native American tribes sorta kinda bred horses, but only the NP were really noted as breeders. Kinda like how a lot of noblemen in England had horses but only a few were noted breeders. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yep. Like E said...  Montanabw (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 *  is a very basic and decisive indication --> "confirms" (?) or "is proof positive" (??)


 * (I assumed you didn't mean to change the direct quote) now reads "...therefore this characteristic is proof positive of membership in the breed." Ealdgyth - Talk 13:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I hesitate to depart from the quotation -- we have no clue WHAT this means, I'm going to fiddle with that a bit, open to further suggestions. Can't "prove" anything until they release a DNA test for LP.  (Which is in the works but not out yet).   Montanabw (talk) 15:53, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can understand teh need for care here. Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:19, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Looking good otherwise (dang, forgot I reviewed this for GAN! Looks much improved since then :)) Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Images
 * "few spot" or "fewspot" leopard?
 * Fixed. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Captions that are complete sentences should end in periods
 * Think I got all of these. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:Nezperceindians1895ish.jpg - if the author is unknown, you can't say with certainty that he or she died more than 70 years ago. Same issue with File:Barnesspottedhorsephoto.jpg
 * I just removed these - we're still trying to figure out where the author of the book we got them from originally got the photos from. Easier to just remove. Ealdgyth - Talk 21:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And I put one back; I don't care about the circus image, though it's cool. But for the two men with the Appy, I have scraped the bottom of the barrel on this image.  I also fixed the tag.  The copyright status of the book (Appaloosa: The Spotted Horse in Art and History) is public domain, because it was published in 1963 and the rights were never renewed on it. There's no doubt about that.  As for the original photographer, I personally contacted the Amon Carter Museum, the University of Texas Press (both involved in publishing the Haines book), Elliot West, and the Montana Historical Society (MHS), which used the image in the West article (scanned from the Haines book) and they were, likewise, unable to track it to any place other than the Haines book.  Essentially, the MHS staff did an extensive search and they couldn't locate the original anywhere (they commented that if the original it still exists, it's probably in a box in someone's attic). The person who took the photo was "Mary Himes of Cayuse, Oregon", I did find here a Mary Himes born in 1877, but no clue if the same person.  If push comes to shove, we can put this under a fair use designation, I suppose. I mean, I don't intend to derail the FA over one image, but it seems that there has got to be a way to salvage this image, which I consider a pretty critical image for the article, showing the people most responsible for the breed with a typical representative.  Montanabw (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * File:AppyPlate.jpg has two different FURs for this article and two different licensing tags. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I took off the Fair Use tag for the article where it is no longer being used. On the licensing tags, I thought I needed both, but if not, just tell me which one to use.  FYI, I personally took that image, edited it to take off the actual number (it was a cousin's car) and uploaded it, so just let me know what needs to be fixed.  Whatever we need to do, I won't derail the FA over the image, so whatever the policy is this week,  I shall humbly obey.   Montanabw (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Grammar ?? "Domesticated horses with leopard spotting patterns have been depicted in art as far back as Ancient Greece ... " Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * My eyes have fried on that one, I've seen it too many times, but am open to ideas to fix. All the nuances are needed, domesticated, leopard spotting, ancient Greece -- evidence of how far back the pattern has been desired by humans is the point.   Montanabw (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Follow up: I took a whack at this, not sure I improved matters, am still open to any way to say it better.   Montanabw (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

How ?? "The Appaloosa has influenced many other horse breeds, ... " This is explained in the body of the article, but is unclear in the lead. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 03:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Fixed, I hope. Open to suggestions if there is a better way to say that. :-)  Montanabw (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Inline query left in the lead. I am not sure all of those External links to different clubs is a good idea-- could tend to become a farm, and Wikipedia is WP:NOT a directory. Can't those be added via a DMOZ link instead? See the Open Directory Project links at the bottom of Tourette syndrome. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 16:13, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed inline inquiry. Not sure DMOZ is a solution to the External links, part of me just says toss 'em all.  But thoughts, everyone?   Montanabw (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you Sandy!  Montanabw (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.