Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Baby Driver/archive1

Baby Driver

 * Nominator(s): DAP (talk) 22:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

This article is about Edgar Wright's 2017 action film Baby Driver, starring Ansel Elgort as a young (hence the title), musically driven getaway driver seeking freedom from heisting with his lover Debora (a diner waitress played by Lily James). It is a landmark film in Wright's catalog for its artistic direction and box office success, by far his biggest hit to date. It is a relatively new good article, and after a copyedit and several more months of revisions, I believe this article satisfies the FA criteria. Looking forward to any constructive feedback. DAP 💅 22:26, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Support Comments from Aoba47
Awesome work with the article. I remember hearing a rather large buzz about this film when it was first released so it is cool to read more about it. I have personally not seen it, because it is just personally not in my preferred genre/wheelhouse of films, but I learned a lot from reading this article. Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this for promotion. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any feedback on my current FAC. Either way, have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I think ALT text would be helpful for the infobox image.
 * Added. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Are the references in the infobox necessary? I would imagine that this information should be present and sourced in the body of the article. I have not personally seen references used in a film's infobox like this; I am not saying it is incorrect, but I just thought it was something worth discussion.
 * Not per se. Admittedly I left the references intact for no particular reason. I can remove them if necessary. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not have an issue with it, but I just wanted to raise it to your attention. I would personally remove it, but you could also wait for other editors' comments as they may disagree with me. Aoba47 (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The phrase "getaway driver" is wikilinked twice in the body of the article. "Atlanta" is also wikilinked multiple times in the body of the article.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You currently wikilink "Edgar Wright" in this sentence "Baby Driver is a longtime passion project Edgar Wright had been developing since 1995", although Wright is mentioned in a previous sentence in the "Cast" section. Here is the sentence with Wright's first appearance: "Wright and the producers at Working Title Films began contemplating the lead role well before they obtained funding for Baby Driver.". The wikilink should be moved up to the first instance and Wright's full name should be used for the first time he is mentioned in the body of the article.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There is a hidden note that Eiza González is credited without the diacritic, but the diacritic (I am assuming it is the one over the a in González) is used in the body of the article.
 * Revised for consistency. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * "Working Title Films" is wikilinked twice in the article.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe the phrase "time frame" should be two words in this sentence (With the limited timeframe, the filmmakers rehearsed for only an hour before they began filming in early morning.).
 * Revised. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a question about this part (Another principal topic of discussion among critics has been Baby Driver's treatment of race). The article says race was a "principal" point discussed by critics, but there is only one source cited so the claim seems unsupported. Even though there are two critics (David Hollingshead and Jane Hu), they are tied to one article. In fact, one of the lines in the source is "and am actually surprised that no one has discussed race much vis-a-vis the film", which suggests that the film's treatment of race was rather overlooked by a majority of critics. The issue of race is an important thing to keep in the article, but I do not believe it was as prominently featured in critical commentary as the sentence in question makes it sound.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a question about the final paragraph of the "Critical response" subsection. I have frequently seen the Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic scores used as an opening paragraph for this type of section; I am assuming it is done this way as these sites introduce a general overview on how a film was critically received before breaking the criticism down further. Why have this part as a final paragraph? I am not saying it is wrong, but I was just curious about it.
 * This was a compromise I settled with to avoid an editing despite with another user, to deemphasize the metadata while maintaining standard practice. Truth be told, I think metadata is redundant, and the summary of reviews in verbal form makes for a much more engaging reading experience. Again, I'll be happy to remove that if necessary. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Understandable, and thank you for the explanation. I can understand the use of the Rotten Tomatoes/Metacritic data as a way of understanding a film's reception at a glance; however, there are issues with both sites and I can understand not wanting to use either. I personally think that both should be kept in the article, but I do not have an issue with it being in the final paragraph. I think it is a fair compromise. Aoba47 (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I do not believe this sentence, "Known in the music industry for his work with Sia, Arcade Fire, and other artists, Baby Driver is Heffington's first foray into film", is grammatically correct. The beginning, dependent phrase (Known in the music industry for his work with Sia, Arcade Fire, and other artists) should be referring to the noun of the next, independent phrase. I do not think Baby Driver is "Known in the music industry for his work with Sia, Arcade Fire, and other artists". Rather, I think you mean "Heffington" instead so the sentence would have to be adjusted accordingly.
 * Revised DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the feedback! I believe I have addressed your concerns (thus far). Let me know what you think. DAP  💅 4:16, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good to me. I support this for promotion. Have a great rest of your day. Aoba47 (talk) 16:06, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Pinging reviewers from my last FAC:, , , , would you guys mind taking a took if or when you have the time? DAP 💅 01:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Support Comments from Homeostasis07
Sorry about the delay. I wanted to write something here several days ago, but my own FAN – and real-life stuff – got in the way. Here are my comments:

Lead
 * Not sure "heisting" is the most appropriate term here. For one, I've never seen "heist" in the gerund form before (heisting). Something like "It stars Ansel Elgort as a young, musically driven getaway driver seeking freedom from a life of crime with his lover Debora (Lily James)." might be better.
 * Revised. I kept "heisting" for context but later became indecisive, since it's an informal gerund in North American English. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Every paragraph in this section begins with Baby Driver. What about mixing it up by beginning the second paragraph with "The film"?
 * Revised. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * "He devised the film's blueprint well into his youth, but the experience helming his early projects shaped his ambitions for Baby Driver." → I don't really know what this is supposed to mean. This seems to be a reference to the point in 'Development' about his music video for Mint Royale, so maybe something like "He had been devising the film's premise since his youth, with his later experience helming other projects helping to shape his ambitions for Baby Driver."
 * Done. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Wright later revised the film's setting to Atlanta in the script; preserving the city's ethos then became an important aspect of the storytelling. → Wright later revised the film's setting to Atlanta, and chose to incorporate the scenery and culture of that city into the story; this became an important aspect of the script.
 * Done. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Plot, Cast and Development
 * Nothing I'd change here.

Filming
 * Wright cited Vanishing Point (1971), The Driver (1978), Point Break (1991), Reservoir Dogs (1993), Heat (1995), among others as significant influences on the film's visual hallmarks and creative direction.→Wright cited Vanishing Point (1971), The Driver (1978), Point Break (1991), Reservoir Dogs (1993) and Heat (1995), among others, as significant influences on the film's visual hallmarks and creative direction.
 * Done. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Visual effects
 * I don't care either way, but thought I should point out here that there's a user going around removing any instance of comprised from every featured/good article. If you don't want them doing that, I'd suggest changing to "Their work for the film consisted of 430 shots," but I don't mind either way. I'd also like to point out that, after watching the film, you've done an amazing job of making this article as comprehensive as possible; those descriptions of the making of key scenes are riveting, and brilliantly written.
 * Eh, that is grammatically correct so I don't expect any issue from that user. Also, thank you for the compliment! DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Stunts and choreography
 * No complaints here.

Sound design
 * Slater said, "Bradley showed me to work musically [...] How a gunshot works with a kick drum, but not too obviously. For every layer that happens musically, have another layer that happens non-musically so that you perceive it only some of the time." → I don't like the first part of this quote. I had to read the source to try and find context, but couldn't find any. "Bradley showed me to work musically" just doesn't make sense, grammatically. I'd consider paraphrasing, or removing it, since it doesn't add much to the article.
 * Removed. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Music
 * No complaints.

Themes
 * Nice use of academic criticism. Also goes to comprehensiveness. Nothing to complain about here.

Release and Reception
 * No complaints.

Box office
 * scooped = a bit too Variety for my liking. What about "earned" or "made"? Also, I see "[86][3]". Make sure all the references are in numerical order.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Critical response
 * [106][107][62], [111][112][62] and [115][111]. Nothing to complain about prose-wise.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Otherwise, this is a fine article, and I'll be happy to support once these points have been fixed. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 00:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for the feedback, and no worries about the delay! I believe I’ve addressed all of your concerns. Let me know what you think. DAP  💅 16:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm happy with the changes you've made, and have no problem providing my support for this article. Good luck with the nomination. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:53, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Pinging FA coordinators for source and image reviews. DAP 💅 16:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Image review (passed)
I hope this helps. Aoba47 (talk) 01:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * File:Baby Driver poster.jpg has an appropriate FUR and ALT text.
 * I do not see any issues with File:Ansel Elgort (35875410045) (colour edited).jpg, File:Lilly James (35036323024).jpg, File:Twickenham Film Studios.jpg.
 * I will assume good faith that File:Edgar Wright by Gage Skidmore.jpg is really the personal work of the original uploader.
 * I believe this is the original, so the upload is probably by the photographer.  Kees08  (Talk)   22:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I am slightly uncertain about the use of File:Downtown atlanta night.jpg as it is somewhat broad. There are many different pictures of very different-looking areas of downtown Atlanta so unless this represents a place shown in the film, I would either remove it altogether or replace it with something else.
 * I get the intended meaning of using File:BabyDriverColorSymbolism.jpg to show how color is used in the film. However, I am wondering if there is a better image to represent this. Aside from the guy in the red coat, the two other guys are wearing dark clothing and the woman is wearing what appears to be white. Aside from the guy in red, I do not see the "the bright, vibrant colors" part from the caption really being represented through the image. I can understand the importance of having an image here, but I think a different one would do the job better.
 * , apologies for the late response; my professional life is consuming most of my free time. I felt the few publicity shots did not service Baby Driver color symbolism well, so I replaced the last image with a screenshot of a video essay which (in my opinion) does a much better job of illustrating that aspect of the film. Let me know what you think, and MANY thanks for initiating the image review! DAP  💅 19:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for addressing everything. This passes an image review. Aoba47 (talk) 20:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Support from FrB.TG
I'll look at it later today. FrB.TG (talk) 10:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Very well-written and comprehensive. I expect to support it once my relatively minor concerns are addressed. I myself currently have an FAC for Leonardo DiCaprio. I would appreciate your input there. (This is not supposed to be a quid pro quo though so review it only if you feel like it.) FrB.TG (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * "Elgort, John Boyega, and Logan Lerman were among a raft of potential candidates considered for star billing.[7][8] The actor auditioned" - it's not wise to use "the actor" right after when you have mentioned three actors.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * "Wright's repeated listening to Orange (1994), the then-recently released fourth studio album by the Jon Spencer Blues Explosion," I think this should be simply "the fourth studio album by Jon Spencer Blues Explosion" without "then-recently released". This is just a suggestion and hence you can ignore it.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * "The release of Shaun of the Dead the following" - this should probably be made clear that Wight directed Shaun of the Dead.
 * Revised. DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * "The latest figures show that 595,111 copies have been sold." MOS:CURRENT
 * Revised. DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not a criticism, quite the opposite actually. I especially like the "Critical reception" section which you have arranged thematically instead of "A said this", "B said this". Kudos!
 * Thank you! DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments! I believe I’ve addressed all of your concerns. I’ll also take a look at your FAC since I have a little bit more free time over the next week. Cheers! DAP  💅 02:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Support excellent work. FrB.TG (talk) 07:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Source review - spotchecks not done


 * FN1 is incomplete and should be citing Sight & Sound rather than BFI more broadly
 * Done. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Still incomplete. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hopefully not now? DAP  💅 01:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * No, but K is a middle initial not part of the surname. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Removed. DAP  💅 15:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Be consistent in when you wikilink portions of your citations
 * Done. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Still inconsistent. Some sources are wikilinked on each appearance (Paste, Rotten Tomatoes), others only on first appearance (IndieWire, Empire). Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. DAP  💅 15:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * FN3 is missing author. Same with FN5, 23, check for others
 * Done. There were a couple of other citations I caught that were missing author. Should all be good now. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Still some missing, eg 38. Should also be consistent in whether authors are presented first or last name first. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. DAP  💅 15:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * FN10 is missing publication date. Same with FN37, 87, check for others
 * Done. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Still some missing, eg 91. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Revised. DAP  💅 01:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Still, eg 136. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. DAP  💅 15:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Be consistent in whether you include publishers for newspapers
 * Done. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * FN19: how did you access this publication? Is it a print source?
 * Podcast source per link. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Why not include that link? Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Revised. DAP  💅 01:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * What makes Art of VFX a high-quality reliable source? Digital Media World? LADbible?
 * The former two are professional interviews and while LADbible is clickbait journalism, they were by far the biggest publication that covered Baby Driver appearance on Netflix. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * ...which does not make them reliable. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * And why not? Art of VFX and Digital Media World are the only sources I've found that contain in-depth information about the film's visual effects. DMW in particular is a significant networking outlet for animators and broadcasters and other media artists. DAP  💅 01:46, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Having in-depth information is not related to how reliable that coverage is. See this resource. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. They're self-published but both are noted experts in visual effects. Vincent Frei (Art of VFX) is a Switzerland-based freelance compositor with a nearly 20-year-long career in blockbuster cinema and Adriene Hurst is most active in the Australian film industry. DAP  💅 15:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * What about LADbible? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Removed. DAP  💅 06:04, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't repeat cited sources in External links. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:52, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. Let me know what you think. DAP  💅 11:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
 * , apologies for the late response. Let me know what you think. DAP  💅 01:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:55, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Coordinator notes
I'm not satisfied that the loop has been closed on all of the above sourcing concerns. -- Laser brain  (talk)  12:24, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * could I get another run through please? DAP  💅 14:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the status on this? -- Laser brain  (talk)  12:32, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * It should be good to go. thoughts?  DAP  💅 07:26, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Just the last point is still pending. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Whoops, done. Not sure why it took me that long to spot it. DAP  💅 12:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

-- Laser brain  (talk)  13:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)