Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Balfour Declaration/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Sarastro1 via FACBot (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2017.

Balfour Declaration

 * Nominator(s): Onceinawhile (talk) 08:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

This article has been significantly improved following another detailed peer review, prose advice from Corinne, and an extrapolation of those comments to tighten up every nook and cranny of the article. Having implemented the prose polishing, the creation a smooth narrative flow throughout, and the trimming of the footnotes, it is now a much easier and more pleasant read. I am pleased to nominate this again for FAC ahead of the centenary on 2 November; I hope you enjoy it. Onceinawhile (talk) 08:44, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments from FunkMonk

 * Support - all my issues were ironed out during the latest peer-review, so I'm happy to see it here again. A flurry of sudden interest and intense edits from many editors, in a way I haven't seen before, seems to have made the article less cohesive right before the first FAC (and after the first peer-review where I, for full disclosure, acted as mentor). FunkMonk (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Image review

 * Suggest scaling up lead image slightly


 * At the previous FAC, you had mentioned proposing an amendment to the UKGov tag wording - any progress on that?
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 12:09, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * File:The_"Basel_Program"_at_the_First_Zionist_Congress_in_1897.jpg: first source link doesn't appear to work.

Nikkimaria (talk) 13:19, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Replies in green above. Many thanks for the speedy review. Onceinawhile (talk) 15:32, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources review
In my view all sources meet the required standards of quality and reliability. This review is concerned with issues of presentation and format.
 * In about 20 cases you use "p." instead of "pp." when citing page ranges (17, 33, 65 etc)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Refs 65 and 73 need ndashes not hyphens
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm a bit dubious about the use of "et seq" in cited page ranges. It's open-ended, not particularly helpful to someone wishing to check. Is it possible to be more precise?
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 32: Your text refers to the Jewish population as "a small minority, approximately 3% of the total" – but I don't see any mention of 3% in the source.
 * . Onceinawhile (talk) 09:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Also in 32, why is it necessary to refer your readers to another WP article for "further details"? What "further details" do they need? (same issue arises with ref 85)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Refs 214 and 236: wikisource citations should give author and date information (there is a useful template available)
 * . Onceinawhile (talk) 10:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 216: Harvard error
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 217: Italicize Jerusalem Post
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 262: requires author and proper source title
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 276: The link on "Virginia Page Fortna" is dead.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 287 lacks publisher information; Jim Miles is the author
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Ref 290: Italicize The Guardian
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Access dates are required in a number of cases: 262, 287, 290 and 292 are obvious examples, but there may be more.
 * . Onceinawhile (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * What is your criterion for adding access dates in the bibliography, which you do on a couple of occasions?
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 11:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * You need to be consistent about including publisher locations for books. In general you don't give them, but in the odd instance you do (Stein, Wavell and Woodward are examples but there may be more)
 * . Onceinawhile (talk) 11:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Be consistent about how publishers are shown. For example, you have "Cambridge University Press", but "OUP". Another abbreviation is "NYU Press". Also, consistency is required in the use of "The...", e.g. "University of Texas Press" and "The University of California Press"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 12:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Yapp appears in the bibliography but has no citations.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

That's all I've found. Brianboulton (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * All fixed; replies in green above. Many thanks for looking at this so thoroughly; I imagine it took some quite some time (I figured that the volume – c.300 citations and c.100 items in the bibliography – would have made a source review more onerous). Onceinawhile (talk) 12:07, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments from Dank

 * "was the origin of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict": "origin" doesn't work because it's ambiguous; it can mean "initial stages", "explanation" or "cause". Pick a different word.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "On the basis of the quid pro quo agreement in the correspondence, the Arab Revolt was launched on 5June 1916. However, in May 1916 the governments of the United Kingdom, France, and Russia secretly concluded the Sykes–Picot Agreement": "However" is the wrong word here, because a secret agreement doesn't negate or mitigate a revolt. Rewrite to clarify which two things are being contrasted.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:10, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Sykes was a British Conservative and Unionist MP whose role had developed from his seat on the 1915 De Bunsen Committee to have a significant influence on British policy in the Middle East, including initiating the creation of the Arab Bureau, whilst Picot was a French diplomat and former consul-general in Beirut.": Loss of clarity, mainly from trying to do too much in one sentence.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * “: no curly quotes, per WP:MOS
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "it was intended that Palestine may become a Jewish Commonwealth if and when ...": might, or would, not may.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:30, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Support on prose per my standard disclaimer. Well done. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. These are my edits. I got down to the last section before the end-sections, Reaction. - Dank (push to talk) 22:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments from Seraphim System
This statement is in the lede: The opening words of the declaration represented the first public support for Zionism by a major political power. I am looking for a source for it in the body but I can't find it, could someone please point it out for me? Seraphim System ( talk ) 14:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 19:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments Support from Midnightblueowl

 * Great work on a very important article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Do we really need the full quotation of the Declaration's wording in the lede? It looks a little messy to have an indented block of prose in the lede itself, and I'm wondering if we would be better off simply paraphrasing its contents in that opening paragraph. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Not my article, but ... personally, I wouldn't want to see this changed without a discussion at WT:FAC of the general principle. - Dank (push to talk) 14:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 15:19, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I have said before that I am not too keen on having both the info box and the text block; now that there is a higher resolution image available, could we not look at this again? Selfstudier (talk) 11:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I opened another discussion here: Talk:Balfour_Declaration ten days ago, but there was no support for a change. Onceinawhile (talk) 07:09, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Anti-Zionist Jews" - link to Anti-Zionism? Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * There is a duplink to Palestine (region) in the lede. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Allied war effort" - this is the first introduction of the concept of the "Allies" in the lede. I'm concerned that there are points like this which require the reader to have a pre-existing understanding of the First World War and its various sides in order to understand what the lede is actually referring to. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 23:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The opening words of the declaration represented the first public support for Zionism by a major political power" - probably could just go with "The declaration represented the first expression of public support for Zionism by a major political power." Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * We link to Palestinians when mentioning "local population of Palestine" but it would be better to move that link to the earlier mention of the "the local population in Palestine". Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:36, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "It greatly increased popular support for Zionism, led to the creation of Mandatory Palestine, which later became Israel and the Palestinian territories, and was the origin of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, considered the world's most intractable conflict." I'm wondering if this would work better as two separate sentences: "It greatly increased popular support for Zionism, led to the creation of Mandatory Palestine, which later became Israel and the Palestinian territories. It was also the origin of the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, considered the world's most intractable conflict." Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

In "Background"

 * The first sub-section has a lengthy paragraph and then a very short one. Consider rearranging so that we have two even-sized paragraphs? That should make it more appealing for readers. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The British Foreign Office worked to encourage Jewish emigration to Palestine" - perhaps "The British Foreign Office encouraged Jewish emigration to Palestine"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The 1881–84 Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire encouraged " - "Anti" should probably be "anti" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Consider aligning the "Basel program" picture to the left, to avoid clustering on the right. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "and former MP" - this acronym has not previously been explained in the article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The Turks began to apply restrictions on Jewish immigration to Palestine in late 1882" - I think that this is the first explicit mention of the Turks; before this we have only mentioned the Ottoman Empire. It might be worth making clear the connection between the two for readers unfamiliar with the situation. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:05, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:06, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " At the meeting David Lloyd George, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, and whose law firm Lloyd George, Roberts and Co had been engaged a decade before by the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland to work on the Uganda Scheme,[40] "referred to the ultimate destiny of Palestine".[41] " This is a bit clunky, especially the middle section. Perhaps it could be broken into two? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " a Zionist, who believed Weizmann's demands were too modest.[" - we could quite easily scrap the comma here and streamline the sentence as a result. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "his election defeat in 1906," - perhaps "his electoral defeat in 1906," would read better? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 21:35, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "member of the Conservative and Unionist Party in their role " - link to Conservative Party (UK); also, probably best to simply use "Conservative Party", which is common use. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 21:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Many further discussions followed, including the initial meetings in 1915–16 between Lloyd George, who had been appointed Minister of Munitions in May 1915,[48] and Weizmann, who was appointed as a scientific advisor to Lloyd George's Ministry of Munitions in September 1915.[" - it is a bit repetitive to use "Minister of Munitions" twice; in the latter case perhaps just "advisor to the ministry in September 1915." Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Seventeen years later in his War Memoirs Lloyd George described these meetings as being the "fount and origin" of the declaration although this claim has been rejected by historians.[" - this sentence could do with some additional commas, after "years", "Memoirs", and "declaration". Midnightblueowl (talk)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * There are a few instances of passive voice where active voice might be more appropriate. "Zionism was first discussed at a meeting of the British Cabinet on 9 November 1914," could be "The British Cabinet first discussed Zionism at a meeting of the British Cabinet on 9 November 1914," while "although this claim has been rejected by historians." could be "although historians have rejected this claim." Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * In the "1915–16: Prior British commitments over Palestine" sub-section, the second paragraph is far, far too long. Definitely trim this into two if not three smaller chunks. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "In late 1915 the British High Commissioner to Egypt, Henry McMahon, had exchanged ten letters with Hussein bin Ali, Sharif of Mecca, in which he had promised Hussein to recognize Arab independence "in the limits and boundaries proposed by the Sherif of Mecca" with the exception of "portions of Syria" lying to the west of "the districts of Damascus, Homs, Hama and Aleppo", in return for Hussein launching a revolt against the Ottoman Empire." This is a very lengthy sentence and it would work better if divided into two sentences. Also, no reason to include the "had" in "had exchanged" and "had promised". Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:46, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " for carving up the area" - "for dividing the area" might be a little more encyclopaedic in tone. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Sykes was a British Conservative and Unionist MP" - no need for "and Unionist", I'd have thought. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "In Sykes’ mind, the agreement became outdated even before it was signed – in March 1916, he was to write in a private letter: " - change the apostrophe after "Sykes" to the standard style; maybe "was" rather than "became"; "he was to write" to "he wrote"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:51, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "borders of the Ottoman empire" - Upper case E needed in "Empire" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "responsibility for Middle Eastern Affairs" - "Affairs" should probably be "affairs" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Sykes’ goals" - again it's the odd apostrophe. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "mobilizing of Zionism" - "mobilisation of Zionism", perhaps? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the wider war had reached " - "the war had reached"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "would first turn in " - "first turned in"; "had declared war" to "declared war"; "was still hoping to avoid" to "still hoped to avoid". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The Russian forces were known to be distracted " - "Russia's armies were distracted"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Link Bolshevik. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Alexander Kerensky's Russian Republic " - perhaps better to state "Alexander Kerensky's Provisional Government"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " and would only withdraw after the final stage " - "and only withdrew after the final stage". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Approvals

 * "Balfour met Weizmann at the Foreign Office on 22 March, in a meeting described by Weizmann in a letter two days later as being "the first time I had a real business talk with him".[94]" This could be edited down a bit to something like: "Balfour met Weizmann at the Foreign Office on 22 March; two days layer, Weizmann described the meeting as being "the first time I had a real business talk with him".[94]" Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Balfour was in agreement" would work as just "Balfour agreed". Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "with the Sherif of Mecca" - link? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the Western Front " - again, link? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the French and Italians were to send" - "the French and Italians sent". Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The third paragraph is very lengthy here; it should be divided into two, if not three. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:40, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Following the US entry into the war on 6 April, Balfour travelled on the Balfour Mission to the United States," - "the US..." but then "the United States". Perhaps the other way around? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "were all in favour of supporting the " - perhaps "all supported the"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Balfour met with Lord Rothschild and Weizmann and asked them " - "and... and"; perhaps "and asked them" could become "asking them". Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " his fellow Conservative and Unionist MP" - again, just "Conservative MP" would probably do. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Drafting and Terms

 * "Declassification of Government archives" - small g for "government", surely? Also, perhaps better to be crystal clear by saying "British government" or "UK government" here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The second paragraph is one long sentence, and I really think we would do best to divide it into two. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "a number of mainly presentational amendments were proposed by Balfour" - we could switch to active voice here, as "Balfour proposed a number of mainly presentational amendments". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "having previously been High Commissioner for Southern Africa during the Second Boer War" - superfluous information here that unduly elongates the sentence. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "debated as to who" - scrap the "as to"; it is superfluous. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Explication of the wording" - might "explication" be a bit too obscure a word here? "Analysis" or something like that might be preferable. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the interpretation of the Zionists" - "the Zionists' interpretation"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "also no accident" - "also intentional"? Or "also deliberate"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * In the second paragraph of "Scope of the national home "in Palestine"", there is a quote which has been italicised, but need not be (and indeed probably should not be). Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Again in the same paragraph, we put words in quotation marks in the first sentence to emphasise them but italicise them in the last for the same purpose. Best if we standardise our approach here. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "described that this community were to observe that they had been " - not keen on this wording, it seems a bit clunky. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "compared against the commitment " - "contrasted against" would be better, no? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "British Governments have " - lower-case g for "governments"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * In "Rights and political status of Jews in other countries", we have two sentences that are standing alone as paragraphs. I think that we need some rearrangement to ensure that the paragraphs are more equitable in size. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:20, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Reaction

 * "It was first published in newspapers on 9 November, " in the "Zionist reaction" section. This information has already appeared in the section. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "after the issuance of the declaration" - perhaps "the declaration was issued" will be easier for a lot of readers. "issuance" is probably not an everyday word for most people. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "From 1918 until World War II Jews in Mandatory Palestine" - probably best to have a comma after "World War II". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the first post-war settlement in Mandatory Palestine," - this is the first link to the article but is not the first mention of Mandatory Palestine in the section. Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Adolf Hitler had taken a similar approach " - "Adolf Hitler took a similar approach". Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:35, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "was to continue for some time to come." - "continued for several years"? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Why do we link to Zionism in the "Evolution of British opinion" sub-section? Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "British public and government opinion became increasingly less favourable to the commitment that had been made to Zionism;" could be streamlined to something like "British public and government opinion became increasingly unfavourable to state support for Zionism;" Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:46, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Historiography

 * We could cut "Lloyd-George's personal testimony in the context of his role as Prime Minister at the time of the declaration" back down to "Lloyd-George's personal testimony" quite easily. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "Balfour had died in 1930 and Sykes had died in 1919" to "Balfour had died in 1930 and Sykes in 1919". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "described a total of nine factors motivating " - to "listed nine factors motivating". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "the Suez Canal and reinforce the route to Great Britain" - scrap the "Great" and wikilink Suez Canal. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "appeal to Jews in Germany and particularly America, " - "United States" rather than "America". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "French pressure for an international administration" - perhaps add "in Palestine" to the end of this sentence. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " that British government's decision" - there needs to be a "the" before "British". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:50, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Long-term impact

 * "With respect to the latter, the declaration has been described as the "original sin" with respect to Britain's failure in Palestine" - "With respect... with respect". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * " it was seen as a repudiation of the declaration by Zionists" - this can be misread as meaning that Zionists themselves repudiated the declaration. Change to "Zionists saw it as a repudiation of the declaration". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The Arab-Israeli conflict in a wider sense ran primarily from 1948–73, but continues today, mainly in the form of the more localized Israeli–Palestinian conflict." - unreferenced and perhaps not really necessary given the prior mentions of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . Onceinawhile (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Scrap "in her work Britain's Moment in the Middle East, 1914–1971" as we do not mention other historian's books in this manner. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)


 * "The 2010 study by Dr. Jonathan " - scrap "Dr.". Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

The Document

 * Additional Manuscripts number 41178 - no need for italicisation, perhaps. Midnightblueowl (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Other

 * I'm really not a fan of the very heavy use of quotation in the Notes, which I find a bit excessive. That would not stop me supporting the article, but I do think it could be trimmed back. Midnightblueowl (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * just to say thanks very much for your thoughtful and constructive comments. Onceinawhile (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * do you expect to have any further comments? I am keen to encourage to have another look at the article following his previous detailed feedback, but if you are still in the middle of a detailed review I imagine he may prefer to wait. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Can people ping me when ready? I would hate to overlook returning to it.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I will ensure that all my comments are provided here by the end of the day, apologies if I have held anything up. Midnightblueowl (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you Midnightblueowl. You certainly haven’t held anything up. You have provided superb comments, always constructive and always clear. Your input has been greatly appreciated. Onceinawhile (talk) 14:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

I have completed putting through your comments. Thank you so much for performing such a thorough assessment!

It’s ready for your review if you have time; I will hold off on making any further changes. Onceinawhile (talk) 06:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Happy to lend my support to such an important article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:21, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments from AustralianRupert
Support: G'day, nice work. I have the following suggestions/observations (apologies if some have already been mentioned above): AustralianRupert (talk) 08:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "...Churchill's 1841–42 exhortations...": probably should be "...Churchill's 1841–1842 exhortations" per WP:DATERANGE
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * same as above for "1881–84 anti-Jewish pogroms" and "1905–06 election campaign after" and other similar constructions
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * the duplicate link checker tool suggests that the following terms are overlinked: Zionist Organization, Nathan Rothschild, Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland, Lloyd George ministry, Western Front (World War I), Russian Revolution, Bolsheviks, Leonard Stein (Liberal politician), League of Nations mandate, King-Crane Commission, Occupied Enemy Territory Administration, Public inquiry, 1936-1939 Arab revolt in Palestine
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 10:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * in the Bibliography, for the Renton work, is there an end to the page range? Currently it has: "pp. 16–"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * in the Bibliography, "A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the struggle that shaped the Middle East" --> probably should use title case caps: " A Line in the Sand: Britain, France and the Struggle that Shaped the Middle East" (please check for other instances)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * in the Bibliography, some isbns have hyphens and some don't (e.g. compare Barr with Antonius)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 14:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * in the Bibliography, for the journal articles, I suggest adding ISSNs if there aren't dois. For instance, Brecher is missing one of these.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * in the Bibliography, "THE ORIGINS AND EVOLUTION OF THE PALESTINE PROBLEM 1917-1988 PART I" --> should use title case instead of all caps per MOS:ALLCAPS
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


 * many thanks for taking the time to review the article, and for your helpful comments. I have made all of the changes, per above. Onceinawhile (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments from BrightR
Very satisfied to see the increase in Palestinian, Jordanian, and other sources on the topic. I can see what Midnightblueowl says about apparently excessive quotes, but I am a fan of direct quotes myself and see it as a benefit to the article's verifiability. At any rate, if required, all the quotes can be removed. Strong support. Bright☀ 10:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Comments by Wehwalt
I weighed in at the initial FAC. Additional comments (more coming).
 * "the United States had yet to suffer a casualty," The U.S. was an Associated Power, not an Ally. A year or two in the 2nd pp might be helpful.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * While you mention that there was enoucragement for Jewish emigration to Israel, I don't see any numbers, nor mention of the Jews already there.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Maybe "co-belligerants"?
 * I did think about that, but concluded that the term belligerant is unnecessarily technical and can be misinterpreted as "aggressor". "Associated power" is long, but I think it is simpler to understand. Onceinawhile (talk) 14:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * " leaving Britain without a sphere of influence.[3] " I might add "in the Levant" or similar
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Consider mentioning long term hopes of Jews to return to Zion, as stated for example in the liturgy, "next year in Jerusalem" and all that.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 22:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "to enlist him in influencing those deemed to be receptive within the British government to their agenda" a bit vague
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 10:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * " but remained a senior member of the Conservative and Unionist Party – today known as the Conservative Party – in their role as Official Opposition.[e]" They're still the Conservative and Unionist Party, technically, so I would lose the full name and just say Balfour was senior in the Conservative Party.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:51, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * FIrst sentence of 1916-17 I might mention that all those people were members of the Liberal Party.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 09:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "The Russian forces were known to be distracted by the ongoing Russian Revolution and the growing support for the Bolshevik faction, but Alexander Kerensky's Provisional Government had remained in the war, and only withdrew after the final stage of the revolution on 7 November 1917." I might toss a "Russian forces" before "only".
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "on 22 March;" 1918?
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The French position in regard to Palestine and the wider Syria region during the lead up to the Balfour Declaration was largely dictated by the terms of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, and were complicated. Likely the "were" should be "was"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Caps inconsistency, "southern borders" vs. "Southern border"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "Israelites" this term is in my experience anyway, rarely used to refer to a modern people.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * " described by Harold Nicolson – who had been involved in preparing the draft – in 1961 as proposing a "sanctuary for Jewish victims of persecution".[127][128] " to make it less choppy I would move "in 1961" to before "by"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "mainly presentational amendments." I might say "technical" as the adjective.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:28, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "although the chief architects of the declaration considered that a Jewish State would emerge in time.[xvii]" I might say "contemplated" for "considered"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "The clause had been drafted together with the second safeguard by Leo Amery in discussion with Lord Milner," I might say "consultation" rather then "discussion".
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "Fourteen points" usually "Fourteen Points".
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "speeches were given by leading Zionists as well as members of the British government including Sykes and Cecil" Was Sykes a member of the government.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:41, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "On 25 April 1920, the San Remo conference established League of Nations mandates for Syria, Mesopotamia and Palestine, the latter including the Balfour Declaration and," I might clarify, as I understand, that the terms of the mandate for Palestine included the Balfour Declaration.
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:34, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "one represented in 1961 by Leonard Stein," represented could be better as "presented" or "argued"
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 07:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * "the government’s wider radical agenda" I'm not clear on what is meant by this--Wehwalt (talk) 03:14, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Onceinawhile (talk) 08:36, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * All done, with many thanks for another very valuable and incisive round of comments. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:33, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Support Nice work. Not sure I agree with every one of your solutions, but that's not required:)--Wehwalt (talk) 02:26, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Sarastro1 (talk) 11:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.