Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Balloon Fight/archive1

Balloon Fight
This article is about Nintendo's 1984 arcade game, Balloon Fight. Although this article may be short, as far as I can see it meets all the criteria. I think if this article became featured it would tell people that just because an article is short, that doesn't mean it isn't good, and it would encourage them to improve short articles. Gamerforever 23:01, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Comment This article seems to have a really short intro (maybe more facts can be found?) Also, the article is maybe a little bit too short. I'm not saying it needs to be very long, but I'm sure that more information can be found. &mdash; Ilyan  e  p  (Talk)  23:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Agreed; too short. Someone needs to research the game's development, sales performance, etc., expand the article, and then resubmit. — BrianSmithson 23:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. A game article needs information on more than gameplay to be FA quality. Staxringold 00:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This article needs major revision before it can even be considered FAC. I agree with the above. And I have to disagree on nominator's comment on length. For any subject you think is of FA quality, there should be works about that particular subject so that you can write substantially on that. Temporary account 01:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose Agree that a lot of work needs to go into this before it is FA quality.  For example -- critical reviews?  Has it stood the test of time?  Was it influenced by any prior games?  Did it sell well?  Video game articles should have the same attention expected of an article on a musical artist, or movie, etc. --Ataricodfish 02:24, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose There's not enough critical detail, it would only marginally fit the "Good Article" standards in its current form.
 * Oppose I agree with Ilyanep, the lead most certainly needs to be expanded, and for that matter the entire article. I'll see if I can dig up some info on the game, because it really was a fun game back in the day :-) -- light  darkness (talk) 14:49, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, needs a lot of work, detail. Phoenix2 00:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)