Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Battle of the Coral Sea/archive1

Battle of the Coral Sea
Very well-written article; comprehensive without extraneous detail; excellent flow & style. NPOV throughout, appropriate supporting images and well-structured body. - Offtherails 01:48, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)


 * Support. -- ALoan (Talk) 13:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Support --Scimitar 22:17, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Minor Objection- First, the lead section is too short- maybe another paragraph? Second, there are too few inline cites (only one), and it is not formatted correctly- try getting more references and putting more in-text citations. Otherwise a well-written article; I will be happy to support in the future! Flcelloguy [[Image:Bass clef2.gif|25px|Cello today?]] Give me a note! 22:34, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Inadequate references.  I haven't read A Record of Activities in Cooktown During World War II, but I don't believe it provided much of the material in the article. ;) We also need evaluations of the battle by historians in the field- names and quotes. Also, the tone is very narrative and not very encyclopedic: I'm thinking of phrases like "mindful that his primary role was to protect Port Moresby" and "Their fears were realised".  Mark1 02:09, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Quite short, one reference. At best, a bottom line of what passes for FAC in our current standards. And plese remove the external link from body and transform into a note. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:24, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Inadequate references and inline citation. - Taxman Talk 14:50, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)