Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beavis and Butt-head/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was withdrawn 14:27, 8 April 2008.

Beavis and Butt-head
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it is one of the best articles on Beavis and Butthead on the internet and certainly in any encyclopedia. Well-researched, well written, with copious sources and vivid images, this article certainly deserves the title. JeanLatore (talk) 04:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Stong oppose. This article would not even make GA status. Try aiming there first before attempting an FA.  bibliomaniac 1 5  Hey you! Stop lazing around and help fix this article instead! 04:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose I suggest you list this article at WP:PR to get some opinions about the article's quality. At the moment, it does not meet the FA criteria or the GA criteria. There are a number of citation needed tags, a cleanup tag from July 2007, and there's just an overall lack of references. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not love) 06:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose I saw only five different inline references, which is inadequate for this topic.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 07:40, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose Lacks citations, several sources are questionable, has a cleanup-tag, large chunks of the article are bulleted lists, may have fair use concerns on the screenshots, unencyclopedic tone in the writing (use of contrations, etc.). I would not pass this for GA as it stands. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.