Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Big Brother (TV series)/archive2

Big Brother (TV series)
I nominate this article because in my opinion the writing is of high quality, it is informative and every aspect of an, in someways complicated show, is explained fully ellisjm 10:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Support (see my reasons above) ellisjm 10:43, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, Verifiability - no references at all, and the list of "facts" is really just a list of unencyclopedic trivia. Thanks/wangi 14:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong object does not seem to meet any of the FA criteria. No references, inadequate lead, check out this one sentence for prose problems: Originally shown in the Netherlands in September 1999, and subsequently cloned across the world, the "housemates" are confined inside a specially designed house where every single point in the house is within view of a video camera, and not permitted any contact with the outside world (although some versions, like the ones from Philippines, Australia, Thailand, Mexico, Germany or Spain have introduced in some seasons precise changes, allowing the contact with the outside in certain situations): no TV, radio, telephone, Internet or other media are available to the housemates, not even writing materials.   Sandy 15:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * PS: I should indicate my bias against this show due to its exploitation of Tourette syndrome, by including Pete Bennett as a participant.  Others should decide if my analysis of the prose problems is unbiased. Sandy 15:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Object per Sandy. Tony 16:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong object per Sandy. Rlevse 23:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Object Lead is far too short, no references, prose style isn't hugely encyclopaedic throughout, far too few sections, and a good half of the article consists of lists and/or tables. The lack of images, meanwhile, while not strictly an FA criteria, certainly don't help the impenetrable blocks of text. I've no doubt that the genesis of a good article is in there somewhere, but it desperately needs an overhaul - most notably, the structure needs drastically sorting. Seb Patrick 08:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * In this case, the lack of images is a point in its favor, since any images would almost certainly be so-called "fair use" images, of which featured articles should have a bare minimum. User:Angr 18:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Support - for the reasons stated by the nominating party.