Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Big Brother (UK)/archive1


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted 06:03, 17 February 2007.

Big Brother (UK)
I'm nominating this article for the extensive work that has gone into it in the past few months. Dalejenkins 19:26, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Has potential, but the refs are crazy. Some are links, some say url accessed, and there's an unreferenced tag in there. Plus there is a trivia section, so this still needs alot of work. Gran2 21:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose Needs more refs. The links to the individual series should be removed as thet are linked in the template at the bottem. Lead needs exspanding. Buc 10:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose there's unreferenced tags there... needs to be FULLY referenced before it can be considered. -- Majorly  (o rly?) 22:51, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Oppose the that's been in the article since November is a clue that it's not yet reached FA status. There's still plenty of work to be done here └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 23:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.