Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bohemian Rhapsody/archive2


 * The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by User:SandyGeorgia 03:25, 13 January 2009.

Bohemian Rhapsody

 * Nominator(s): Top  Gear  Freak  20:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * previous FAC

I'm nominating this article for FA status because it recently became a GA (which I also nominated) and now after a peer review, I think it's ready. I am open to comments which will help it grow. Top Gear  Freak  20:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - the prose is very poor. I suggest withdrawing this and getting an uninvolved editor to copy-edit the whole article. Graham Colm Talk 20:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Note: I see no indication that WP:FAC instructions were followed:
 * Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FAC process. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article prior to nomination.

Sandy Georgia (Talk) 21:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose on criterion 3 These issues should be relatively easy to resolve. Awadewit (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * File:QueenBohemianRhapsody Mama.ogg - This fair use rationale does not list a specific purpose of use. Why does the reader need to hear this particular clip?
 * File:QueenBohemianRhapsodySolo.ogg - The purpose of use in this fair use rationale is too vague. Please describe what it is about the band's style specifically that is illustrated by this clip.
 * File:Bohemian vid.jpg - The band members are already depicted in the album cover. This image thus violates WP:NFCC #3a - minimal usage, which states "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information."

Sandy Georgia (Talk) 01:59, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.