Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cathedral of the Assumption (Louisville)

Cathedral of the Assumption (Louisville)
I think that this is a very complete article with lots of nice photos.--Exir KamalabadiFeel free to criticize me 05:27, August 29, 2005 (UTC)


 * Object. What, if anything, does the copyright tag Church mean?  Are the images public domain?  Are they copyrighted-free-use?  Are they "fair use"?  It's used on the images Image:Churchfont.jpg, Image:Steeple.jpg, Image:Bapistry.jpg, Image:Font.jpg, Image:Coronation window.jpg, Image:Cathedra.jpg, Image:Cathedral organ.gif, and Image:Nave.jpg, and on the sound files Image:Glorylord.ogg and Image:Verbumcaro.ogg. --Carnildo 06:24, 29 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Object – 1) No references 2) Misuse of subheadings. Please increase the length of each subheading or merge with the parent heading. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  06:33, August 29, 2005 (UTC)


 * Object - images are a problem as stated above. Perhaps you could ask User:Essjay,  who seems to have added most or all of them,  to clarify the copyright status of them. If they are indeed fair use, then a fair use rationale should be put on each image description page, and you may consider reducing the number of images used, if this is the case.  The use of references is essential, and the article is lacking in these.   Lead paragraph needs to be expanded, and the number of small (one paragraph and even one sentence) sections should be condensed into broader headings.  At first glance it looks like the subject has been covered with extreme brevity - this is a somewhat misleading impression created by the number of headings and small sections. On the whole it's well written, but these a fairly major issues that need to be addressed.  Rossrs 14:05, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * If the images are fair use, then every last one of them should be removed, and replaced with a free-license image. There's nothing here that can't be replaced by a Wikipedian with a camera. --Carnildo 18:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * yes of course, quite correct. Rossrs 10:20, 30 August 2005 (UTC)