Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chesham/archive1

Chesham
(Self-nomination) I think this would make a good featured article. It has lots of detail, applicable pictures, is fairly clearly written, comprehensive and relatively stable. JoeBaldwin 00:13, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. You might want to have a look at the featured article criteria and check some things.  First, there is no reference section at all and FA criteria requires inline citations.  I'd also move the graphic at the bottom to a better position.  The stub tag is still on the article and shouldn't be.  Business, Industry, and Transport seems subsectioned to death -- might want to strike some of those.  Also, some of the lists should be turned into prose, particularly the one under bus.  It's a very nice start, but I think it has quite a bit to go before being ready for FA.  It also needs a peer review to help work on the actual writing.  Chetwynd, British Columbia may be helpful reading for those working on this article.  Thanks! Air.dance 02:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. Needs to go to peer review, be referenced and have citations. Some things that would have been raised in a peer review: History section very short; geography only a single sentence about the river. Need sections on local politics; newsworthy events over the years. Demographics should have ethnic and religious breakdowns and age profiles. What percentage of the people living in the town were born there? Is there a movement to move the airstack elsewhere due to noise complaints? The section at the end of Recreation about youths causing trouble (if this is important to keep) could easily be cited from local newspaper reports or politicians' statements. For reference and ideas on expansion, a trip to the local library (I assume you're from the town) should pay dividends. Amazon listed about 12 books with Chesham; the British Library lists 91. (Not all will be relevant). But have a look at the town and city articles that have been featured (as suggested above, plus Sheffield) to see how it works. I hope this is useful. --BillC 22:07, 5 April 2006 (UTC)