Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chris Benoit/archive1

Chris Benoit
Chris Benoit exemplifies the best in professional wrestling, and his article exemplifies one of the best written articles here on Wikipedia. about a wrestler. Chad1m 03:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Object. The article lacks references as required by FA criteria 2c.  The image Image:Benoit & Woman.jpg is lacking source information.  The "Wrestling facts" section also needs to be converted from a list format into text. --Allen3 talk 03:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Object per Allen3. Also needs proofreading.--Bcrowell 03:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, as above. Also, is there any information on him outside of his career?  Childhood, inspirations, influences, that sort of thing? Fieari 04:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Object. Per Fieari and Allen3. Some sections, like records and trivia should be converted into prose. RyanG e rbil10 04:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Refer to WP:PR - this is a nice-looking article, but the lists are excessive ("Westling facts", "Trivia", "Championships and accomplishments", "Championship succession") - please move to a sub-page, or sumamrise as prose here, or both. References are also essential. -- ALoan (Talk) 17:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, just doesn't cut it as written. -AKMask 19:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Object per above. Staxringold 16:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This was referred to peer review from FAC, because it clearly has a snowball's chance of being promoted. Johnleemk | Talk 17:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * This article was returned to FAC because peer review is not a dumping ground for failing FACs. If the submitter wants a peer review he can request one himself without the cluttered text from a past FAC review (that said linking to the past FAC nomination is fine). Cedars 08:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have de-listed this nomination from WP:FAC, noting that it doesn't have any chance of succeeding, and also that the nominator seems to have nominated and then abandoned it. Please compare the page instructions: "If you nominate an article, you will be expected to make a good-faith effort to address objections that are raised." The nominator is kindly advised to take it to Peer review provided s/he is motivated to work on the article to improve it. Bishonen | ノート 01:26, 18 March 2006 (UTC).