Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chromatophore

Chromatophore
I'd like to nominate this for a featured article, as i feel it meets the content requirement and is a fascinating subject that people ask about time and time again at the science reference desk. I guess it is a self nom, as i have provided most of the material over a period of many months, after setting myself a challenge to make a featured article from a stub. I have made efforts for peer review, and have had some excellent advice   from both scientists and copyeditors that i have tried to incorporate. I hope it has been enough, if not i'd appreciate your constructive criticism to reach my goal.  Rockpock e  t  04:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Commment The 'and' here seems out of place and awkward: "containing and light reflecting" Rlevse 10:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed, I believe. Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, I get it now; before I it made me think a word was missing or the and should not be there. Support now.Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support. Nice job. Rlevse 13:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Fits FA criteria, nicely written article. — Wackymacs 17:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Jeronimo 17:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. I couldn't resist doing a little copy editing, but that's just me. (-: Anville 20:06, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Thanks for the copyediting, much appreciated.  Rockpock e  t  21:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support nicely well done Jaranda wat's sup 03:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support per all above. Anonymous  _Anonymous  12:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support: Very well done and as readable as biochemistry and morphology can be (barring car chases and explosions, of course). Geogre 14:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Note to Self: find a way to work car chases and explosions into my next FA nomination. Anville 16:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Support. Nice read. Themillofkeytone 19:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Excellent article. &mdash;  Coat of Arms  ( talk )  04:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Well done and interesting article. Anomaly1 01:43, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Support: Very good work in this article.--P-Chan 02:50, 15 June 2006 (UTC)