Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cincinnati, Lebanon and Northern Railway

Cincinnati, Lebanon and Northern Railway
User:Ta bu shi da yu suggested I nominate this as a FAC after its time on WP:PR. It is a concise complete account of a small Southwestern Ohio railroad with a photo, references, and external links. PedanticallySpeaking 15:49, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it's an excellent article, personally. Support! - Ta bu shi da yu 15:59, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. And who will have won, when the railroad has gone? -Ashley Pomeroy 20:13, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. It's short but sufficiently comprehensive IMHO.  JYolkowski 23:18, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Too many red wikis means that the article exists in a bit of a vacuum Fawcett5 04:40, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * The absence of other articles is no reason to object to the nominated article. Jeronimo 09:09, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Object. This seems pretty good, but the article really needs a map to show the route of the railroad.  Jeronimo 09:09, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral. In terms of content this is first class, but I think the article has too many red links, a route map would be nice.
 * As said above "The absence of other articles is no reason to object to the nominated article." Or we could just remove all the red links and add them when they have an article. Peb1991 22:30, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Support I agree about the route map. While there are a lot of red links, I think it is meaninful to look at what the red linked subjects are. Most are older railroads which WikiProject:Trains participants haven't gotten to yet. The number of older railroad articles is currently growing daily. Perhaps getting one like this featured will stimulate more writing, in this case, from someone with either Ohio or Pennsylvania Railroad knowledge and interests. The content is good and balanced. Route maps are nice, but from my experience, often not available through PD sources for these smaller and older railroads. Vaoverland 23:21, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I've also removed some red links and replaced them with stubs. JuntungWu 12:28, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I may sound a little overly critical here, but I'm still not quite convinced. I've gone through it with a quick copyedit to resolve a couple run-on sentences and fix some grammar, but I think there could still be some improvement in the prose.  I'd like to see more pictures, but I can understand that they may be hard to find.  The only real objection that I have at this point is that the article lacks a route map. slambo 02:35, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * The article claims in the lead and reorganization sections that the line ran from Cincinnati to Dayton but the route section lists Cincinnati to some unknown place called Lebanon Junction. Where is this place? Did the line not reach Dayton proper? Is this past Dayton? Rmhermen 20:54, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * I made a stab at a map and added it. Rmhermen 22:26, Mar 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Lebanon Junction was just east of Dayton in Montgomery County. From there its trains proceeded on the other road, the Toledo, Delphos, and Belmont for the remaining couple of miles.  Later the line was reconstructed and it went directly into Dayton.  I've added a sentence to this effect.  PedanticallySpeaking 16:31, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)